AJCN 19th International Congress of Nutrition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 3, 618-624, September 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Fetal programming of body dimensions and percentage body fat measured in prepubertal children with a 4-component model of body composition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, deuterium dilution, densitometry, and skinfold thicknesses1,2,3

Marinos Elia, Peter Betts, Diane M Jackson and Jean Mulligan

1 From the Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (ME); Department of Child Health, Southampton University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom (PB and JM); and Public Health Nutrition Group, Obesity and Metabolic Division, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (DMJ)

2 Supported by the Wessex Medical Trust, United Kingdom (Hope; research grant G06; charity no. 274839) and by the Children's Research Fund, Panthenon Trust, and the Stainer Charitable Trust.

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to M Elia, Institute of Human Nutrition, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 113, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO 16 6YD United Kingdom. E-mail: elia{at}soton.ac.uk.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Intrauterine programming of body composition [percentage body fat (%BF)] has been sparsely examined with multiple independent reference techniques in children. The effects on and consequences of body build (dimensions, mass, and length of body segments) are unclear.

Objective: The study examined whether percentage fat and relation of percentage fat to body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) in prepubertal children are programmed during intrauterine development and are dependent on body build. It also aimed to examine the extent to which height can be predicted by parental height and birth weight.

Design: Eighty-five white children (44 boys, 41 girls; aged 6.5–9.1 y) had body composition measured with a 4-component model (n = 58), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (n = 84), deuterium dilution (n = 81), densitometry (n = 62), and skinfold thicknesses (n = 85).

Results: An increase in birth weight of 1 SD was associated with a decrease of 1.95% fat as measured by the 4-component model (P = 0.012) and 0.82–2.75% by the other techniques. These associations were independent of age, sex, socioeconomic status, physical activity, BMI, and body build. Body build did not decrease the strength of the associations. Birth weight was a significantly better predictor of height than was self-reported midparental height, accounting for 19.4% of the variability at 5 y of age and 10.3% at 7.8 y of age (17.8% and 8.8% of which were independent of parental height at these ages, respectively).

Conclusions: Consistent trends across body-composition measurement techniques add strength to the suggestion that percentage fat in prepubertal children is programmed in utero (independently of body build and BMI). It also suggests birth weight is a better predictor of prepubertal height than is self-reported midparental height.

Key Words: Programming • body composition • birth weight • fat • protein • mineral • water • lean mass • 4-component model • height • parental height • shape • body build • leg • trunk • length


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A consistent link has been found between poor fetal growth, manifested by reduced birth weight and reduced height in both children (1-3) and adults (4-8). However, those studies have not taken into account the confounding effects of parental height (1-3), which is related to the height of the offspring through genetic and environmental factors (9-11). One way in which maternal height can influence birth weight is by its relation to pelvic shape and size (12), which is known to influence fetal growth and birth characteristics (13). Nutritional status and placental function also influence fetal growth and birth characteristics (14), but the overlap and relative importance of parental height on the one hand and other factors involved in programming of childhood or adult height on the other hand are unclear.

Body composition, including percentage fat and fat distribution, may also be programmed during early development and may contribute to the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome in later life (15-18). Studies that investigated these influences in humans have largely relied on simple body-composition techniques, especially skinfold thicknesses, which have limitations (6), especially if programming alters the distribution of fat between subcutaneous and internal sites (19) or between body segments. Furthermore, although some studies have found a positive relation between birth weight and one or more skinfold-thickness measurements in preadolescent children (20), others have not (21). Three preadolescent studies have used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which also has some limitations (22-24). One study found a significant relation between birth weight and fat-free mass but not fat mass (percentage fat was not reported) (25). Another study found a negative association between birth weight SD score (SDS) and percentage body fat (%BF), after adjusting for current weight SDS, but it did not adjust for other variables, such as age, sex, and physical activity (26). The third study found a positive relation between birth weight and both fat and fat-free mass [but again %BF was not reported or adjustments made for body mass or body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2), which might suggest subtle effects of programming on body composition] (27). Densitometry and deuterium dilution techniques assume a constancy of the density and hydration fraction of fat-free mass, respectively, which varies between persons and during growth and development (28), but they have not been used to examine the fetal programming hypothesis. A 4-component model of body composition (water, mineral, fat, and protein) (24, 29) is more robust than the individual reference methods (30), but it too has not been used to examine the fetal programming hypothesis. Therefore, although some of the classic body-composition techniques, which are based on independent principles, have not been used to examine the fetal programming hypothesis, techniques that were used have not always produced consistent results. Finally, although body build (or body shape, which can be defined in terms of length and mass per centimeter of various body segments) was implicated in altering relations of BMI to percentage fat (31, 32), its role in the fetal programming hypothesis has not been examined.

This study aimed to examine the following 2 interrelated hypotheses about programming: 1) birth weight, an endpoint of fetal growth, is a better predictor of height in preadolescent children than is midparental height, and 2) birth weight predicts percentage fat of prepubertal children independently of body build, BMI, and body-composition technique.


   SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The study involved 85 white children (44 boys, 41 girls) 6.5–9.1 y of age, who were recruited from a larger sample of children (n = 786) participating in a school surveillance project on growth in the Southampton region of England. The surveillance project included all school classes of children with the desired age range. These children had routine records kept of their birth (including gestational age and birth weight) and of their weight and height at 1.5, 3, and 5 y of age, in accordance with the policy of the Local Health Authority. Only children who volunteered to participate in the study and who had a gestational age of ≥37 wk were included. The SDSs were calculated with the use of the 1990 UK growth charts as reference (33). The SDSs of the following variables did not differ significantly between the sample population and the surveillance population: birth weight (0.046 and 0.056, respectively; P > 0.50), current weight (0.61 and 0.35; P = 0.08), height (0.27 and 0.08; P = 0.11), and BMI (0.52 and 0.62; P > 0.50). The mean gestational age was the same (39.6 and 39.6 wk). The mean (±SD) measured weight of the 85 children at 7.8 y of age was 28.92 ± 6.83 kg, and their height was 1.277 ± 0.069 m.

The children, and their parents, were asked to attend the Clinical Research Facility at Southampton General Hospital. A questionnaire was used to obtain information about the socioeconomic status (SES) (34) and activity level [scored as 1) lower than their peers, 2) similar to their peers, and 3) more than their peers]. This 3-point scale is a simplified version of a 5-point scale, which was validated in children (35). Self-reported paternal and maternal heights were also recorded. SDSs were calculated (33) and midparental height (average of maternal and paternal SDSs) were established. The children had their weight measured electronically to the nearest 0.1 kg with the use of a Seca708 electronic weighing machine (Seca Medical Scales and Measurement Systems, Birmingham, United Kingdom), and height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm with the use of a Leicester stadiometer (Invicta Plastics Ltd, Leicester, United Kingdom). Body composition was measured with 5 separate methods. DXA was undertaken with the use of Hologic Delphi and software version 12.2 (Vertec Scientific Ltd, Reading, United Kingdom). Air densitometry (use of whole-body air displacement plethysmography to establish body density compared with hydrodensitometry, which involves underwater weighing) was undertaken with the use of the BODPOD S/T system (Life Measurement Inc, Cranlea and Co, Birmingham, United Kingdom). Calculations assumed, first, that thoracic gas volumes (FRC + 1/2 tidal volume) were the mean values predicted by 3 child-specific equations (36-38) and, second, that the density of the fat-free body was 1.087 kg/L (30). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps + subscapular) were used to calculate %BF by using the equations of Slaughter et al (39). Deuterium dilution was used to measure total body water, assuming that deuterium oxide space is x1.04 water space (to account for exchangeable deuterium), and then converted to fat-free mass, assuming that it contains 76% water (30). Finally, body composition was assessed with the use of a 4-component model (29), which was applied to 58 children. The precision (1 SD) for measurement of body fat and fat-free mass was estimated to be 0.28 kg by deuterium dilution ({approx}1% body weight), 0.33 kg by air densitometry, and 0.39 kg by DXA. By using the 4-component model, the precision for measuring water was estimated to be 0.21 kg, 0.02 kg for mineral, and 0.22 kg for fat and protein.

Body dimensions were calculated with the use of DXA scans, which were photo-enlarged approximately 3-fold. Distances between specific points were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm with the use of a ruler and converted to absolute values by relating them to the dimensions of the scanned area. The following segment lengths were established: head and neck, from the top of the skull to the midpoint of a line joining the top of the acromial processes; trunk, from the lower end of the neck to the midpoint of a line joining the top of the midshaft of the femurs; and legs, as the difference between measured height and length of head, neck, and trunk. Leg length was also calculated as the sum of the upper leg (distance between upper end of the midshaft of the femur to the knee joint) and the lower leg (x1.15 distance from the knee joint to the ankle joint). This result was based on 14 measurements (1.15 ± 0.02; 10 boys, 4 girls; 7.8 ± 0.5 y of age) in children in which the position of the foot relative to the tibia allowed measurements between the bottom of the calcaneus and the ankle joint. The value agrees closely with that obtained in adults (6) (anthropometric measurements of knee joint to ankle joint and ankle joint to heal) and skeletons. The mean of the left and right sides were used in the calculations of lengths of body segments. The intraobserver CV for lengths of body segments, which were established with the measurements on separately photo-enlarged scans, were as follows: head and neck, 1.53%; trunk, 0.98%; femur, 1.93%; tibia, 1.53%; bihumeral breadth, 1.46%; and bifemoral breadth, 1.8%. The validity of the technique was assessed by scanning metal rods of known length (0.5–1.5 m). Body build, defined as the length and mass per centimeter of the legs and trunk (or head, neck, and trunk) and the bifemoral width, was accessed from the above-mentioned measurements of the various body segments.

Written informed consent was obtained from a parent of each subject. The study was approved and conducted according to the requirements of the South West Hampshire Local Ethics Committee.

Regression of body composition or body dimensions on birth weight was undertaken with and without adjustments for covariates, such as current weight, height, age, sex, SES, and physical activity. Graphical inspection of the relation between birth weight and percentage fat did not show a U-shaped curve, and, when each body-composition method was examined with linear and quadratic equations, the former were associated with better P values. Therefore, only linear regression results are reported here. The effect of body build was examined by adjusting body composition for trunk (or head, neck, and trunk) and leg characteristics (length and mass per centimeter of these segments) and for frame size (bifemoral breadth). To examine the relative importance of midparental height and birth weight on the height of the children (SDSs), correlations and semipartial correlations were calculated (40). The variables involved in calculating the semipartial correlation were height SDSs of the children (dependent variable) and birth weight SDSs and midparental height SDSs (independent variables). The difference between 2 non–independent regression coefficients was established as described by Steiger (41).

Analyses were performed with the use of the STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (version 12.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). A P value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Values are reported as mean ± SD, except where otherwise stated.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The characteristics of the children studied and their weight, height, and BMI SDS at 1.5, 3, 5, and 7.8 y of age are shown in Table 1Go. Their current measured weight at 7.8 y of age (28.9 + 6.9 kg), height (1.28 ± 0.07 m), and BMI (17.6 ± 3.2) were all associated with positive SDSs. The mean height SDSs at 1.5, 3.5, and 6.5 y of age ranged from –0.136 to 0.271 m. The SDSs for birth weight, current weight, and current BMI did not differ significantly between sexes (44 boys, 41 girls). They also did not differ significantly between the group of 58 children (28 boys, 30 girls) whose body composition was measured with the 4-component model and the total group of 85 children. The %BF, measured by various techniques, and the density and hydration fraction of the fat-free mass are shown in Table 2Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Characteristics of children studied1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Percentage fat by various body composition techniques and density and hydration fraction of fat-free mass calculated with the 4-component model1

 
Birth weight SDS was a significant positive predictor of height at all these ages, explaining an increasing proportion of the variability up to 5 y of age (r2 = 0.194; r = 0.440; P < 0.001) and decreasing thereafter (r2 = 0.103 at 7.8 y of age; r = 0.320; P = 0.003). In bivariate analysis birth weight was found to be a stronger predictor of childhood height than was midparental height at all ages studied. The prediction based on parental height improved with age, from r2 of <0.01 (r < 0.1) at 1.5 y of age (NS) to r2 of {approx}0.06 (r = 0.247; P = 0.037) at ≥5 y of age, when an apparent plateau was reached (P < 0.05) (Figure 1Go). The relation between birth weight SDS and height SDS was significantly better at 5 y of age than at 7.8 y (P < 0.05) and 1.56 y of age (P < 0.05). The relation between midparental height and height SDS at ≥5 y of age was not significantly stronger than at 1.5 and 3 y of age. No significant linear or quadratic trends over time were observed in the mean r2 values (between birth weight or parental height on the one hand and height on the other hand), except for the linear relation between birth weight and height of the offspring (r2 = 0.835; P = 0.030). Birth weight was not only found to be a better predictor of children's height than was midparental height SDS in bivariate regression analysis but also in multiple regression analysis involving both predictor variables; the semipartial r2 values at 7.8 y of age are shown in Figure 2Go. At 7.8 y of age, the relations with maternal SDSs (r2 = 0.045; r = 0.211; P = 0.050) were stronger than were paternal SDSs (r2 = 0.027; r = 0.165; P = 0.132).


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.. The extent to which midparental height SD scores (SDSs), birth weight SDSs, and the 2 in combination predict height SDSs of children at different ages (regression analysis; n = 71, 74, 72, 83, and 85 at consecutive time points). The r2 values > 0.0455 (n = 85) to 0.0545 (n = 71) are significant (P < 0.05; 2 tailed).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.. Venn diagram shows the extent to which birth weight SD scores (SDSs) and midparental height SDSs predict height SDSs of children at 7.8 ± 0.6 y of age (n = 85). The diagram shows the values for r2 x 100 for bivariate analyses [10.3% (P = 0.003) and 6.1% (P = 0.023) of the variability, respectively], the associated semipartial r2 x 100 [8.8% (P = 0.005), 4.6% (P = 0.037) of the variability], and the multiple r2 x 100 [14.9% (P = 0.001) of the variability].

 
Measured height (127.7 ± 6.8 cm) at a mean age of 7.8 y correlated well (r = 0.95) with height (127.2 ± 6.7 cm) estimated by DXA. The length of all body segments tended to be greater in children with higher birth weight (Table 3Go). At 7.8 y of age, birth weight (SDS) was significantly related to leg length (height – length of head, neck, and trunk) and to bifemoral breadth (after adjustment for age and sex) but not to trunk length or to head, neck, and trunk length (Table 3Go). None of the relations between birth weight SDS and length of body segments remained significant after further adjustment for height or height SDS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Regression analysis for change in length of body dimensions by increase in birth weight SD score, adjusted for age and sex (n = 85)

 
The %BF was inversely related to birth weight, both before and after adjustment for BMI, age, sex, physical activity, and SES. It remained inversely related to birth weight even when body build was included as an independent variable in multiple regression analysis (Table 4Go). Inverse relations between %BF and birth weight SDS were found with all body-composition techniques, and all these relations were significant, except for the technique involving deuterium dilution.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4. Regression analysis for change in percentage fat by increase in birth weight SD score1

 
The %BF (4-component model; n = 55) was not significantly related to changes in height SDS (from 1.5 to 3, 5, and 7.8 y of age) either before or after adjustment for age, sex, and current BMI. In addition, %BF was not significantly related to changes in weight SDS (from birth to 1.5, 3, 5, and 7.7.8 y of age) after adjustment for BMI SDS or for age, sex, and BMI SDS, except for the change in weight SDS between birth and 7.8 y of age [an increase of 1.447% (SE: 0.698%) body fat for each increase in weight SDS; P = 0.042; partial r = 0.274].

The effect of birth weight on fat mass, fat-free mass, and components of fat-free mass (total body water, protein, and mineral) were also examined (Table 5Go). With increasing birth weight an increase was observed in all the components of fat-free mass and a decrease in the fat mass. However, only some of these relations were statistically significant [ie, for fat mass and mineral mass in bivariate analysis and for fat-free mass in multiple regression analysis (see Table 5Go; protein mass was of borderline significance independently of age, sex, weight, height, physical activity, SES, and body build)].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 5. Regression analysis for change in body composition (4-component model) by increase in birth weight SD score 1

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
This study suggests that birth weight is an important predictor of height in 6.5–9.1-y-old children and quantitatively more important than self-reported midparental height. The poorer prediction by midparental height may be due to the use of self-reported rather than measured height. Midparental height, however, may still be a better predictor of final adult height than that in early childhood. It is also possible that technical errors associated with measurement of height contribute to this possibility, because the same measurement error will result in a stronger relation in older children, who are taller, than younger children, who are shorter.

This study also shows that the relation between birth weight and %BF is already established as early as 6.5–9.1 y of age and is quantitatively similar to relations found in older men (6). Thus, in a study of older men (6), which used the same DXA and air densitometry machines as in this study, there was 4.4% more fat (as percentage of body weight) (mean of DXA and air densitometry results) in the low- than in the high-birth-weight groups ({approx}10th and {approx}90th centiles of birth weight, respectively). This result was obtained after adjusting for differences in BMI between groups, which did not differ significantly in SES and physical activity. In this study involving prepubertal children, there was 5.0% more fat (as percentage of body weight) when birth weight was on the 10th than on the 90th centile (–1.65 and 1.65 SDSs), after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, physical activity, and SES. This is equivalent to {approx}3.6% fat/kg difference in birth weight. These considerations have at least 2 implications. First, although BMI alone is frequently used as an indicator of adiposity or of %BF, it may provide misleading information about programming of body composition. For example, in a study of 7-y-old English children a positive relation was found between birth weight and obesity, which was defined according to BMI (42). Our study in children of a similar age provides evidence that children with a lower birth weight have more percentage fat than do children with a higher birth weight, after adjustment for current weight and height. Second, this information can help explain the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in persons with lower birth weight who, in comparison with persons with higher birth weight, are shown to have a greater %BF after controlling for BMI and other confounding variables (43, 44).

Previous studies that examined the association between birth weight and body composition have typically relied on simple body-composition techniques, which also have potentially important limitations. For example, it is possible for programming to alter the distribution of fat between subcutaneous and internal sites of the body (19) or the distribution between different subcutaneous sites, both of which could invalidate the use of skinfold thicknesses when used in a standard way to predict body composition (6). Similarly, it is theoretically possible for programming to alter the relative lengths and dimensions of body segments, which, in turn, could invalidate the use of bioimpedance or bioresistance measurements. Approximately 90% of whole-body bioimpedance arises from the limbs (45, 46), which means that changes in the composition or mass of the trunk may have little overall effect on the results. Even reference body-composition techniques, such as densitometry and deuterium dilution techniques, have their limitations (30). The 4-component model of body composition is more robust, because it does not depend on assumptions about the density or hydration fractions of the fat-free mass (47), which change during growth and which affect interpretation of classic densitometry and deuterium dilution techniques, respectively. The concerns about methods are emphasized by the significant differences in results found between several techniques. For example, %BF (see Results), which in some cases, was greater than the effect of birth weight SDSs (10th–90th centiles) on %BF, which was discussed earlier. This study is the first to apply the 4-component model of body composition to assess the fetal programming hypothesis, and it has used more independent body-composition techniques than any other previous study. However, despite the differences between methods, consistent trends on the effect of birth weight on body composition were found across a range of reference body-composition techniques that depend on different principles, including the 4-component model, which is difficult to obtain, and measurements of skinfold thicknesses, which are easy to obtain. This adds confidence to the findings of the study. The findings also add confidence to the use of skinfold-thickness measurements alone for measuring %BF in a population of this age rather than the need for other more complicated techniques. Quantitative differences between methods, in the relations between birth weight and percentage fat, reflect a combination of biological assumptions and technical errors associated with measuring body composition by various methods. The study also adds information on the relation of birth weight SDSs and components of the fat-free body, which do not necessarily change in the same proportions, reflecting biological differences between persons as well as some measurement imprecision.

Accelerated growth during early childhood was also proposed to increase risk of cardiovascular disease in later life (48, 49). However, this study found no significant association between %BF at 7.8 y of age and changes in height SDS (from 1.5 y of age onward) or weight SDS (from birth onward), after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, apart from the weak relation with the increase in weight SDS between birth and 7.8 y of age. The lack of length measurements at birth is a limitation to this analysis, because accelerated growth in the first 1.5 y of life could be important.

Finally, because during growth and development important changes in segment lengths and body proportions occur, it can be hypothesized that relation of BMI to percentage fat in children (50) are at least partly explained by differences in body build, which may, in turn, be due to fetal programming (31, 32). Babies with a low birth weight not only end up being shorter and lighter adults than babies with high birth weight, but they also end up having a different body build, because of preferential preservation of the upper-body segment (and preferential loss in the legs which make up the lower-body segment). Malnutrition during postnatal life was also reported to preferentially shorten leg length rather than head and trunk length (51-55). A change in height as a result of shortening or lengthening of the trunk (without associated change in body composition) might be expected to alter BMI to a greater extent than the same change in height produced by lengthening or shortening the leg. This is because the change in height resulting from alterations in trunk length might be expected to be associated with a greater change in mass than are the same change in height because of alterations in the leg length. However, this approach is simplistic because it does not take into account important associations that may alter the BMI in subtle and unpredictable ways, such as associations between changes in length of segment lengths and mass per unit length. In this study, adjustment for such variables, as well as for frame size, did not reduce the strength of the relation between birth weight and % BF (even when adjustments for BMI were made). This suggests that the relations are independent of body build.

The study has a number of limitations. It involved a relatively small number of children, who volunteered to participate rather than being randomly selected from the general population; it did not examine sequential changes in body composition; it considered only white children; and it used self-reported parental height, which is not as accurate as measured height. However, the study has used a more robust method of body composition and a wider range of body-composition techniques than any previous study to examine the fetal programming hypothesis. The results support the concept that percentage fat is programmed, and it shows for the first time that body build is not responsible for this effect in children. It also suggests that programming of height of children 6.5–9.1 y of age occurs independently of midparental height.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the staff of the Wellcome Clinical Research Facility for their help with this study and Eric Milne for the deuterium analysis.

The author's responsibilities were as follows—ME, PB, and JM: contributed to the study design; DMJ: facilitated the deuterium analysis; JM and ME: contributed to data collection; and ME: undertook the statistical analysis. All authors provided intellectual input. None of the authors had a conflict of interest.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Martorell R, Stein AD, Schroeder DG. Early nutrition and later adiposity. J Nutr 2001;131(suppl):874S–80S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bavdekar A, Yajnik CS, Fall CH, et al. Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-year-old Indian children: small at birth, big at 8 years, or both? Diabetes 1999;48:2422–9.[Abstract]
  3. Matthes JW, Lewis PA, Davies DP, Bethel JA. Body size and subcutaneous fat patterning in adolescence. Arch Dis Child 1996;75:521–3.[Abstract]
  4. Sayer AA, Syddall HE, Dennison EM, et al. Birth weight, weight at 1 y of age, and body composition in older men: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:199–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Phillips DI. Relation of fetal growth to adult muscle mass and glucose tolerance. Diabetic Med 1995;12:686–90.[Medline]
  6. Kensara OA, Wooton SA, Phillips DI, Patel M, Jackson AA, Elia M. Fetal programming of body composition: relation between birth weight and body composition measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric methods in older Englishmen. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:980–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gale CR, Martyn CN, Kellingray S, Eastell R, Cooper C. Intrauterine programming and adult body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:267–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Weyer C, Pratley RE, Lindsay RS, Tataranni PA. Relationship between birth weight and body composition, energy metabolism, and sympathetic nervous system activity later in life. Obesity Res 2000;8:559–65.[Medline]
  9. Allison DB, Paultre F, Heymsfield SB, Pi-Sunyer FX. Is the intra-uterine period really a critical period for the development of adiposity? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19:397–402.[Medline]
  10. Loos RJ, Beunen G, Fagard R, Derom C, Vlietinck R. Birth weight and body composition in young adult men–a prospective twin study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1537–45.[Medline]
  11. Loos RJ, Beunen G, Fagard R, Derom C, Vlietinck R. Birth weight and body composition in young women: a prospective twin study. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:676–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tague RG. Do big females have big pelves? Am J Phys Anthropol 2000;112:377–93.[Medline]
  13. Novotny R, Davis J, Wasnich R, Biernacke I, Onaka A. Maternal pelvic size, measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, predicts infant birthweight. Am J Human Biol 2000;12:552–7.[Medline]
  14. US Department of Agriculture, The Human Development Network of the World Bank (UNICEF). Technical consultation on low birth weight, New York, 30-31 March 2000. New York: US Department of Agriculture, 2002.
  15. O'Brien PMS, Wheeler T, Barker DPJ, eds. Fetal programming: influences on development and disease in later life. London, United Kingdom: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press, 1999.
  16. Hocher B. Fetal programming of cardiovascular diseases in later life— mechanisms beyond maternal undernutrition. J Physiol 2007;579:287–8.[Free Full Text]
  17. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Pinal C. The developmental origins of adult disease. Matern Child Nutr 2005;1:130–41.[Medline]
  18. Delisle H. Early nutritional influences on obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. International Workshop, Universite de Montreal, June 6–9, 2004. Matern Child Nutr 2005;1:128–9.[Medline]
  19. Bellinger L, Sculley DV, Langley-Evans SC. Exposure to undernutrition in fetal life determines fat distribution, locomotor activity and food intake in ageing rats. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30:729–38.[Medline]
  20. Rogers I, EURO-BLCS Study Group. The influence of birthweight and intrauterine environment on adiposity and fat distribution in later life. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:755–77.[Medline]
  21. Okosun IS, Liao Y, Rotimi CN, Dever GE, Cooper RS. Impact of birth weight on ethnic variations in subcutaneous and central adiposity in American children aged 5–11 years. A study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:479–84.
  22. Tothill P, Hannan WJ. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;904:63–71.[Medline]
  23. Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Jennings G, Elia M. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition: effects of depth and tissue thickness, including comparisons with direct analysis. Clin Sci (Lond) 1995;88:319–24.[Medline]
  24. Sopher AB, Thornton JC, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, Heymsfield SB, Horlick M. Measurement of percentage of body fat in 411 children and adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with a four-compartment model. Pediatrics 2004;113:1285–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Singhal A, Wells J, Cole TJ, Fewtrell M, Lucas A. Programming of lean body mass: a link between birth weight, obesity, and cardiovascular disease? Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:726–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, et al. Abdominal fat and birth size in healthy prepubertal children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1667–73.[Medline]
  27. Rogers IS, Ness AR, Steer CD, et al. Associations of size at birth and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of lean and fat mass at 9 to 10 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:739–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Elia M. Organ and tissue contribution to metabolic rate. In: Kinney JM, Tucker HN, eds. Energy metabolism: tissue determinants and cellular corollaries. New York, NY: Raven Press;1992:61-79.
  29. Fuller NJ, Jebb SA, Laskey MA, Coward WA, Elia M. The use of a four-component model for evaluation of the density and hydration fraction of fat free mass, and the validation of bedside prediction methods of body composition. Proc Nutr Soc 1992;51:127A (abstr).
  30. Elia M. Body composition analysis: an evaluation of 2 component models, multicomponent models and bedside techniques. Clin Nutr 1992;11:114–27.[Medline]
  31. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg Yap M, Wang J, Lin FP, Schmidt G. The impact of body build on the relationship between body mass index and percent body fat. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:537–42.[Medline]
  32. Norgan NG. Population differences in body composition in relation to the body mass index. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994;48(suppl):S10–25; discussion S6–7.[Medline]
  33. Freeman JV, Cole TJ, Chinn S, Jones PR, White EM, Preece MA. Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child 1995;73:17–24.[Abstract]
  34. Office for National Statistics (ONC) UK. Standard occupational classifications. London, United Kingdom: The Stationery Office, 2000.
  35. Sallis JF, Patterson TL, Buono MJ, Nader PR. Relation of cardiovascular fitness and physical activity to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adults. Am J Epidemiol 1988;127:933–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Fields DA, Hull HR, Cheline AJ, Yao M, Higgins PB. Child-specific thoracic gas volume prediction equations for air-displacement plethysmography. Obes Res 2004;12:1797–804.[Medline]
  37. Rosenthal M, Cramer D, Bain SH, Denison D, Bush A, Warner JO. Lung function in white children aged 4 to 19 years: II–Single breath analysis and plethysmography. Thorax 1993;48:803–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zapletal A, Paul T, Samanek M. [Normal values of static pulmonary volumes and ventilation in children and adolescents]. Cesk Pediatr 1976;31:532–9 (in Czech).[Medline]
  39. Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, et al. Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol 1988;60:709–23.[Medline]
  40. Howell DC. Multiple regression. In: Statistical methods for psychology. 4th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Pub Co, 1997:509–64.
  41. Steiger JH. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 1980;153:622–54.
  42. Reilly JJ, Armstrong J, Dorosty AR, et al. Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study. BMJ 2005;330:1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Leon DA, Lithell HO, Vagero D, et al. Reduced fetal growth rate and increased risk of death from ischaemic heart disease: cohort study of 15 000 Swedish men and women born 1915–29. BMJ 1998;317:241–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Osmond C, Barker DJ, Winter PD, Fall CH, Simmonds SJ. Early growth and death from cardiovascular disease in women. BMJ 1993;307:1519–24.[Medline]
  45. Fuller NJ, Fewtrell MS, Dewit O, Elia M, Wells JC. Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis in children aged 8–12 y: 1. The assessment of whole-body composition. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:684–91.[Medline]
  46. Fuller NJ, Elia M. Potential use of bioelectrical impedance of the ‘whole body’ and of body segments for the assessment of body composition: comparison with densitometry and athropometry. Eur J Clin Nutr 1989;43:779–91.[Medline]
  47. Fuller NJ, Jebb SA, Laskey MA, Coward WA, Elia M. Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free mass. Clin Sci 1992;82:687–93.[Medline]
  48. Dulloo AG, Jacquet J, Seydoux J, Montani JP. The thrifty ‘catch-up fat’ phenotype: its impact on insulin sensitivity during growth trajectories to obesity and metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30(suppl):S23–35.
  49. Weaver LT. Rapid growth in infancy: balancing the interests of the child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;43:428–32.[Medline]
  50. Elia M. Programming of body composition and metabolic function. Int J Body Compos Res 2006;4:3–6.
  51. Jantz LM, Jantz RL. Secular change in long bone length and proportion in the United States, 1800–1970. Am J Phys Anthropol 1999;110:57–67.[Medline]
  52. Tanner JM, Hayashi T, Preece MA, Cameron N. Increase in length of leg relative to trunk in Japanese children and adults from 1957 to 1977: comparison with British and with Japanese Americans. Ann Hum Biol 1982;9:411–23.[Medline]
  53. Gunnell DJ, Davey Smith G, Frankel S, et al. Childhood leg length and adult mortality: follow up of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) Survey of Diet and Health in Pre-war Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:142–52.[Abstract]
  54. Bogin B, Kappell M, Varela Silva MI, Orden AB, Smith PK, Loucky J. How genetic are human body proportions? In: Dasgupta P, Hauspie R, eds. Human growth development and maturation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2001:205–21.
  55. Bogin B, Smith P, Orden AB, Varela Silva MI, Loucky J. Rapid change in height and body proportions of Maya American children. Am J Hum Biol 2002;14:753–61.[Medline]
Received for publication December 12, 2006. Accepted for publication April 13, 2007.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Chomtho, J. C. Wells, J. E Williams, A. Lucas, and M. S Fewtrell
Associations between birth weight and later body composition: evidence from the 4-component model
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1040 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
C. B. Ebbeling and D. S. Ludwig
Tracking Pediatric Obesity: An Index of Uncertainty?
JAMA, May 28, 2008; 299(20): 2442 - 2443.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS