AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Mobley, S. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Mobley, S. L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Mobley, S. L
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 3, 527, September 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


EDITORIAL

Calcium intake, body fat, and bones—a complex relation 1,2

Connie M Weaver and Stacey L Mobley

1 From the Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

2 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to CM Weaver, Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. E-mail: weavercm{at}purdue.edu.

See corresponding article on page 639.

Two commonly cited risk factors for osteoporosis are dietary calcium intake and body weight (1). Recently, many reports have found that dairy and calcium intakes are inversely related to body fat (2, 3). In this issue of the Journal, Varenna et al (4) conclude that a low dietary calcium intake may increase the risk of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women, but this negative effect can be offset by a high body mass index (BMI).

Varenna et al measured lumbar (L2–L4) bone mineral density (BMD), BMI, and dairy intake in 1777 healthy, early postmenopausal women in a cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study. Women in the lowest quartile of dairy intake had a greater BMI and were at a greater risk of being overweight than were women in the highest quartile of dairy intake (OR: 3.717; P < 0.001). Lumbar BMD was significantly lower in the lowest dairy intake quartile than in the highest dairy intake quartile (0.862 compared with 0.890 g/cm2; P = 0.003); however, the prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and postmenopausal fractures did not differ statistically between quartiles.

Given the interdependence of predictors of bone mass and fracture incidence, it should not be surprising that the literature is confusing. This is especially true for observational studies, for which the findings often depend on the adjustments made and are often fraught with confounders. Observational studies do not always find a relation between calcium or dairy intake and BMD—a marker of fracture risk. For example, dairy calcium intake was positively related to total hip BMD in elderly men (r = 0.23, P = 0.0019), but not in women, in the study by McCabe et al (5). However, when the same subjects were randomly assigned to consume a calcium supplement, a vitamin D supplement, or a placebo, both men and women responded equally to treatment (6). A cross-sectional study would not have predicted that women would have responded favorably to calcium supplementation.

Dietary constituents other than calcium should also be considered when evaluating the effect of dietary calcium on bone and body weight. High-calcium diets have been reported to be significantly higher in protein, saturated fat, vitamin D, magnesium, and phosphorus (7). Many observational studies evaluating calcium's effects do not account for these nutrients as potential covariates or confounders, which may contribute to conflicting results.

In the study by Varenna et al, overweight had to be in the model to see a significant relation between dairy intake and osteoporosis risk. The protective effect of a high BMI on bone in individuals with low calcium intakes may not extend to higher BMIs than in the cohort study by Varenna et al. Although increasing weight can be protective against bone loss, excess adipose tissue can activate calcifying vascular cells and inhibit osteoblastic differentiation through lipid oxidation products (8).

Given our current knowledge, it is probably unwise to offer the choice between drinking milk and gaining weight for protection against bone loss. Most individuals would more likely benefit from the consumption of 3 servings of dairy products daily as recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (9) to protect against bone loss and to possibly manage healthy body weight.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CMW is on the advisory boards of Wyeth Global Nutrition and Pharmavite and has received research grants from Delavau and Dairy Management Inc. SLM is on the advisory board of the National Dairy Council.

REFERENCES

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, 2004.
  2. Teegarden D. The influence of dairy product consumption on body composition. J Nutr 2005;135:2749–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Caan B, Neuhouser M, Aragaki A, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of postmenopausal weight gain. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:893–902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Varenna M, Binelli L, Casari S, Zucchi F, Sinigaglia L. Effects of dietary calcium intake on body weight and prevalence of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:639–44.
  5. McCabe LD, Martin BR, McCabe GP, Johnston CC, Weaver CM, Peacock M. Dietary intakes affect bone density in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:1066–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Peacock M, Liu G, Carey M, et al. Effect of calcium or 25OH vitamin D3 dietary supplementation on bone loss at the hip in men and women over the age of 60. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3011–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Holbrook T, Barrett-Connor. Calcium intake: covariates and confounders. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:741–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Parhami F, Morrow AD, Balucan J, et al. Lipid oxidation products have opposite effects on calcifying vascular cell and bone cell differentiation. A possible explanation for the paradox of arterial calcification in osteoporotic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:680–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2005.

Related articles in AJCN:

Effects of dietary calcium intake on body weight and prevalence of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women
Massimo Varenna, Lucia Binelli, Silvia Casari, Francesca Zucchi, and Luigi Sinigaglia
AJCN 2007 86: 639-644. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Mobley, S. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Mobley, S. L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Mobley, S. L


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS