AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. H
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. H
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 6, 1401-1410, June 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Vegetables, fruit, and antioxidant-related nutrients and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based case-control study1,2,3

Linda E Kelemen, James R Cerhan, Unhee Lim, Scott Davis, Wendy Cozen, Maryjean Schenk, Joanne Colt, Patricia Hartge and Mary H Ward

1 From the Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN (LEK and JRC); the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (UL, JC, PH, and MHW); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, WA (SD); the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (WC); and the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI (MS)

2 Supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and contracts with the National Cancer Institute [N01-CP-67010, N01-PC-67008, N01-PC-67009, N01-PC-65064, N02-PC-71105, and R25 CA92049-03 (LEK)].

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to JR Cerhan, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail: cerhan.james{at}mayo.edu.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Factors related to DNA damage and altered immunologic responses, such as reactive oxygen species production, are associated with the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Objective: The aim was to evaluate NHL risk with intakes of vegetables, fruit, and nutrients involved in antioxidant activities.

Design: Incident case subjects aged 20–74 y were identified between 1998 and 2000 from a National Cancer Institute–sponsored study by using four Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Control subjects, who were selected by random dialing (<65 y) and from Medicare files (≥65 y), were matched to cases by age, center, race, and sex. Of 1321 case and 1057 control subjects who enrolled, dietary data were collected on a subset (466 cases and 391 controls). Carotenoid intakes were estimated by using updated values from the US Department of Agriculture nutrient databases. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs.

Results: NHL risk was inversely associated with higher number of weekly servings of all vegetables (multivariable OR for highest compared with lowest quartile: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.95; P for trend = 0.04), green leafy vegetables (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.96; P for trend = 0.01), and cruciferous vegetables (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 1.00; P for trend = 0.05) and with higher daily intakes of lutein and zeaxanthin (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.91; P for trend = 0.06) and zinc (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.91; P for trend = 0.02). An effect modification by exercise and NHL subtype was observed with some food groups and nutrients.

Conclusion: Higher intakes of vegetables, lutein and zeaxanthin, and zinc are associated with a lower NHL risk.

Key Words: Anticarcinogenic agents • cruciferous vegetables • carotenoids • diet • neoplasms • zinc


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that are characterized by proliferation of T or B cells; most of these cancers originate from B cells. The age-adjusted incidence of NHL increased from 11.1 per 100 000 persons in 1975 to 19.3 per 100 000 persons in 2002, and NHL had one of the fastest rising cancer rates during this time period (1). The reason for this increase is largely unknown. Studies have consistently shown strong associations with factors related to altered immunologic responses (2). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production such as superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals can alter DNA and lipid membrane structures, particularly in proliferating cells such as those involved in the immune system, which suggests a protective effect of nutrients involved in antioxidant activities against NHL.

Epidemiologic studies that investigated the association between NHL and vegetables, fruit, and the nutrients found in these foods reported inverse associations with increased intakes of all vegetables combined (3, 4), cooked tomato products (5), green leafy vegetables (4, 6), and cruciferous vegetables (3–5), although other studies reported no (7–9) or elevated (10, 11) risk. Some studies described inverse associations with higher fruit intake (4, 6, 7, 10), whereas others found null associations (3, 5, 8, 9, 12). Most studies have not supported an inverse association between NHL risk and dietary or supplemental intake of vitamins A, C, or E (3, 5, 7, 13) or individual carotenoids (3, 5, 7). Variations in dietary assessment, study design, sample size, or analyses may have contributed to the different findings. For example, not all studies controlled for total energy, and energy imbalance has been associated with NHL in some studies (14). Furthermore, micronutrients such as zinc have not been studied, and few investigated carotenoids other than {alpha}- and ß-carotene (3), particularly in NHL subtypes. Therefore, we evaluated the associations between antioxidant and related nutrient intakes, as well as the food sources of these nutrients, and the risk of NHL using detailed dietary and risk factor data collected from a large, multi-centered, population-based case-control study of NHL conducted in the United States.


   SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study design and population
Between 1998 and 2000, 1321 of 2248 (59% response) potentially eligible incident case subjects aged 20 to 74 y with NHL and without evidence of HIV infection were enrolled from National Cancer Institute–sponsored Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries in Iowa, Seattle, Los Angeles, and Detroit. Population control subjects aged <65 y without history of NHL were identified by random dialing and those aged ≥65 y were identified from Medicare files. Controls were frequency-matched to cases by age (5 y), center, race, and sex. Of 2409 potentially eligible controls, 1057 (44%) were enrolled. Details of the study are presented elsewhere (15). All respondents provided informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by each center’s Institutional Review Board.

Risk factors and dietary assessment
The study population was divided into 2 groups; each group received a different version of a computer-assisted personal interview and a different self-administered questionnaire. A split study design was employed to maximize the amount of data collected. Both versions of the computer-assisted personal interview contained questions about demographic characteristics, hair coloring, occupational history, and pesticide use. One version (administered to all African Americans and 50% of non–African Americans) also included an extended medical history and use of illicit drugs; persons assigned to this group were mailed a self-administered questionnaire on family medical history. The other version of the computer-assisted personal interview (administered to the other 50% of non–African Americans) included questions about cell phone use, sun exposure, hobbies, and an abbreviated medical history; persons assigned to this group were mailed a self-administered questionnaire on dietary intake as assessed by a modified Block 1995 Revision of the Health Habits and History Questionnaire (16, 17). For each food, participants were asked to indicate their usual portion from a selection of 3 serving sizes and how often, on average, they had consumed that amount over the past year. The 9 responses ranged from "never or less than once per month" to "every day". In addition, the participants provided information about the regular use of multivitamins, defined as ≥ 1 pill/wk, over the past year. Regular multivitamin consumers were then queried about their frequency of use according to 4 categories, which ranged from never to every day, and about their duration of use according to 6 categories, which ranged from <1 y to ≥10 y. The same information was requested for 8 single vitamin and mineral preparations (including vitamin A, ß-carotene, and zinc). Information about the type of multivitamin consumed [One-A-Day (Bayer corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC)- or Centrum (Wyeth, Madison, NJ)-type compared with antioxidant-type, and multivitamins with or without minerals] was obtained, and standard doses were applied to each type of multivitamin preparation. For vitamins C and E, information on the usual dose was collected. For individual supplements excluding vitamins C and E, the following values were assigned to each vitamin or mineral: 10 000 IU for vitamin A, 25 000 IU for ß-carotene, and 50 mg for zinc. We used the updated 1998 US Department of Agriculture–National Cancer Institute Carotenoid Database (http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/Carot/) to evaluate the {alpha}- and ß-carotene, lycopene, ß-cryptoxanthin, and lutein and zeaxanthin content of fruit, vegetables, and multicomponent foods that contained fruit and vegetables; these values were supplemented with the 1993 values (18–20) when 1998 values were unavailable. Daily intakes of nutrients were calculated by summing the product of the frequency of consumption of the serving of each food by the nutrient content of that serving of food across all food items. The present analysis is based on persons who returned the dietary questionnaire. This included 482 of 552 cases and 417 of 462 controls who were assigned to the dietary group plus 2 other cases and 2 other controls who inadvertently received and returned the dietary questionnaire, for a total of 484 cases and 419 controls. We excluded subjects if the daily number of reported foods on the questionnaire was <4 or >30 for the men and <3 or >30 for the women or if the number of food items missing or left blank exceeded 20% (21–24); in total, 18 cases and 28 controls were excluded.

Statistical analysis
Individual foods were grouped according to similar nutrient content or genus classification and expressed as weekly servings. Food groups and individual nutrients were modeled as categorical variables corresponding to the quartile distribution of intake in the control group. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with unconditional logistic regression using the lowest category of intake as the referent. For each dietary variable, we ran 2 statistical models. The first was adjusted for age (<35, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, or ≥65 y), sex, race (White, Asian, or other), study center (Detroit, IA, Los Angeles, or Seattle), and quartiles of total energy intake. The second was adjusted for the aforementioned variables and for potential confounders and variables that were suspected of being associated with NHL: smoking (nonsmoker, <7, 7–16, 17–34, or ≥35 pack-years), family history of NHL, body mass index (in kg/m2; <20, 20–24.9, 25–29.9, or ≥30), exercise [in weekly metabolic equivalents; no exercise, 30–270, 271–675, 676–1080, or >1080], education (<12, 12–15, or ≥16 y), quartiles of ethanol consumed (in g/wk), and quartiles of dietary fiber intake (in g/d), which was shown to be a potential confounder (5). A chi-square test for trend was conducted treating the categorical dietary variable as a continuous variable in the regression models (25). We also conducted polychotomous logistic regression (26) according to NHL subtype and simultaneously modeled the comparison between controls and each of the 2 most common NHL subtypes (follicular and diffuse) using the lowest category of dietary intake as the referent. Heterogeneity of the dietary NHL subtype associations was tested by case-only analysis of follicular compared with diffuse subtypes (27). Secondary analyses evaluated the extent of effect modification by level of the covariates with the likelihood ratio test between models that included and excluded a product term for the nutrient and effect modifier (28).

Before the logistic regression analysis, food groups and nutrients were adjusted for total energy by taking the residual from a linear regression model in which total energy intake was the independent variable and the dietary variable was the dependent variable (29). Subsequent logistic regression models of NHL included total energy as a covariate. The ORs and 95% CIs from these models were compared with those from models that were adjusted for total energy by using the standard multivariable approach without the additional step of residual analysis. The 2 modeling approaches for energy adjustment generally estimated similar effect estimates with some exceptions (see Results). Given that models that use the standard multivariable method of energy adjustment may produce spurious associations in the presence of correlated errors (30), we present data on the energy-adjusted values from the residual method. Analyses were carried out with SAS version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) software systems. Two-sided P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dietary data were analyzed for 466 cases and 391 controls. Comparable distributions for age, sex, race, and study center were observed between the cases and controls in the present analyses compared with all eligible cases (n = 2010) and all eligible controls (n = 2002; data not shown). A greater proportion of cases than controls were aged <65 y (Table 1Go). Differences in the intakes of total energy, total vegetables, specific vegetable categories, and for some nutrients were observed between cases and controls (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Risk factor and dietary characteristics between case and control subjects from the National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (1998–2000)1

 
The associations between food groups and NHL are presented in Table 3Go. Compared with those in the lowest quartile, persons in the highest quartile of vegetable intake (ie, ≥20 servings/wk) had a 42% lower risk of NHL after a multivariable analysis (P for trend = 0.04). Reduced risks were also observed with persons who consumed ≥6 servings green leafy vegetables/wk and for those who consumed ≥3 servings cruciferous vegetables/wk. Because higher vegetable consumption may simply be a marker of a healthy diet that is lower in meat and fat intakes, which have been reported to be associated with NHL in this (31) and other studies (3, 7), we additionally adjusted for servings of red, processed, and fried meats (beef, pork, processed meats, fried chicken, and fried fish); the ORs, however, were relatively unchanged (data not shown). Inverse associations were also observed with higher intakes of yellow, orange, and red vegetables and processed tomato products, but these associations were attenuated after adjustment for other variables. Intake of fruit and consumption of whole grains, a source of antioxidant-related nutrients, were not significantly associated with NHL (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of the association between weekly servings of fruits and vegetables and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (1998–2000)

 
Of the nutrients, NHL risk was lowered by 46% with higher intakes of lutein and zeaxanthin after covariate adjustment (P for trend = 0.06), whereas NHL risk was not significantly related to intakes of vitamins A, C, and E and other dietary carotenoids (Table 4Go).After multivariable adjustment, inverse associations were observed between NHL risk and the highest quartile of zinc intake from dietary sources (P for trend = 0.02) and dietary plus supplemental zinc intake (P for trend = 0.08). The ORs for nutrients were not significantly changed after additional adjustment for intakes of saturated fat and polyunsaturated fat, nutrients that have previously been shown to be associated with NHL (5, 9).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of the association between daily intakes of antioxidants and related nutrients and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (1998–2000)1

 
To further examine whether the relations between vegetable, lutein and zeaxanthin, and zinc consumption and NHL risk were independent of other potential risk factors for NHL, we conducted multivariable analyses within strata that were defined by levels of these factors (Table 5Go). The lowest risk of NHL was consistently found in the most active and the leanest body mass index (<25) subgroup, although the P for interaction across all dietary variables by body mass index categories was not statistically significant (data not shown). Lower risks were also observed for the highest compared with the lowest quartiles of zinc intake in the women (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.64), but not in the men (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.96; P for interaction = 0.04).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 5. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of the association between antioxidant-related foods and nutrients and non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype, stratified by exercise level, in the National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (1998–2000)1

 
We also examined the associations between food groups and nutrients and NHL risk by follicular and diffuse tumor subtype (Table 6Go). Similar to the associations found for all NHL types, intakes of vegetables (total, green leafy, and cruciferous) and lutein and zeaxanthin were inversely associated with the 2 subtypes (data not shown). However, the test for OR heterogeneity was significant between the 2 NHL subtypes for the variables listed in Table 6Go; all variables except dietary lycopene showed stronger inverse associations with diffuse than with follicular NHL subtype.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 6. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of the association between antioxidant-related foods and nutrients and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes in the National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (1998–2000)1

 
Finally, we observed no significant differences in the effect estimates of most foods and nutrients with NHL between the nutrient residual and standard multivariable methods of energy-adjustment. However, the associations between NHL and the highest quartile of dietary vitamin E intake were stronger with the standard multivariable method (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.94; P for trend = 0.09) than with the nutrient residual method (Table 4Go). The associations between NHL and dietary zinc (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.32; P trend = 0.30) and total zinc (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.48, 1.29; P trend = 0.53) intakes were not statistically significant with the standard multivariable method, but strengthened and became significant with the nutrient residual method (Table 4Go).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
We found inverse associations between NHL risk and higher intakes of all vegetables combined, but particularly with green leafy and cruciferous vegetables, and with higher intakes of the nutrients lutein and zeaxanthin and zinc. Some of these associations appeared more pronounced in active participants and in those with a diffuse NHL subtype. Importantly, the choice of energy-adjustment method could give spurious results and requires careful consideration in analyses of dietary intake.

Other studies have reported similar inverse associations between NHL incidence and higher intake of all (3), cruciferous (3–5), and dark green (4, 6) vegetables. Collectively, these vegetables contain lutein and zeaxanthin (32)—nutrients also inversely associated with NHL in our study—the vitamin folate, which is involved in pathways of DNA synthesis, repair, and methylation reactions (33, 34), and glucoinolates, which are converted in vivo to isothiocyanates, compounds that are potent inducers of carcinogen-detoxifying enzymes (35). In a companion article, we found that the association of higher dietary folate was inversely related to NHL (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.21) and reached statistical significance with diffuse-type NHL (36). Studies showed inverse associations between cruciferous vegetables and several cancers, particularly in carriers of the null genotype of the family of phase II conjugating (detoxification) enzymes, ie, glutathione S-transferases (37–42). Induction of phase II detoxification enzymes reduces exposure of the target tissue to DNA damage and may block the initiation stage of chemical carcinogenesis (35). We also observed a reduced risk of NHL with increasing servings of tomato products, although this was not statistically significant after multivariable adjustment. One other study reported a significant 70% risk reduction with >1 serving tomato products/wk (5). The risk reduction may be attributable to lycopene, which was not assessed in that study and showed no association with NHL in our study, or to other nutrients found in tomatoes such as folate and vitamins C and E (43), which alone showed inverse, though nonsignificant, associations with NHL in our study but when considered together may contribute importantly to risk. In addition to the ROS-scavenging role of carotenoids and antioxidant-related nutrients (44), it has been suggested that they can also enhance DNA repair activity by modifying gene expression distinct from their direct antioxidant properties (45). Our findings agree with most previous investigations that found no significant association between NHL and intakes of fruit (3, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12) and intakes of individual vitamins A, C, and E and specific carotenoids, regardless of whether they were dietary or supplemental intakes (3, 5, 7, 13, 46).

A potentially important observation in this analysis was the inverse association between zinc and NHL; that the association was consistent with both dietary and supplemental sources argues against multivitamin use as the exposure of interest. Zinc can physically displace DNA-bound iron, thereby reducing the extent of iron-catalyzed hydroxyl radical production, such that as intracellular concentrations of zinc rise, more iron may be displaced from nucleoproteins and less hydroxyl radical–driven DNA damage may occur (47). Zinc also has widespread action on different enzymes, peptides, transcriptional factors, and cytokines that are involved in various physiologic steps of immune development and reactivity (48, 49). Zinc is a component of several single-strand DNA binding proteins including replication protein A, DNA glycosylase, and endonuclease IV, which are essential for DNA replication and mismatch repair (47). Evidence suggests that the activity of zinc-containing DNA binding domains of proteins progressively diminishes as the environment becomes increasingly prooxidant (47) and this may interfere with genomic stability. Preliminary findings of supplementation with 45 mg elemental Zn/d in 5 healthy volunteers compared with placebo-treated volunteers showed a reduction by almost 50% of nuclear transcription factor {kappa}B binding to DNA, a marker of ROS production (50). Given the ubiquitous involvement of zinc in numerous metabolic processes, chronic marginal intakes may lead to inadequate host defense mechanisms and predispose to insults such as DNA breaks and early neoplastic transformations.

Our suggestive finding of inverse associations between NHL and higher intakes of green leafy vegetables and lutein and zeaxanthin in participants with higher physical activity may indicate neutralization of exercise-induced ROS production by these vegetables and nutrients (51). Exercise results in increased amounts of malondialdehyde in blood, an indirect indicator of lipid peroxidation. Subjects given supplemental intakes of different antioxidants showed reduced malondialdehyde concentrations after exercising compared with those who were given placebo, which suggests that antioxidants may offer some protection against exercise-induced ROS production (51).

Other studies that examined associations by NHL subtype (3, 5, 9) generally reported similar findings across subtypes, although diffuse NHL was inversely related to {alpha}-carotene (5) and yellow and orange vegetables (9) and positively associated with retinol (5). Follicular NHL was inversely related to intakes of total vegetables (9, 4) and fruit (4), particularly in women (4). We found similar associations of foods and nutrients across NHL subtypes, although higher intakes of all fruit and citrus fruit, dietary ß-cryptoxanthin, dietary and total vitamin C, and total zinc were more strongly related to diffuse than to follicular NHL subtype; however, our findings were based on a small number of cases and require replication.

Our study has several strengths. It is one of the largest studies of diet and NHL risk conducted across multiple centers that stratified NHL by common subtype. To our knowledge, our study is the first epidemiologic report of the associations between zinc and NHL. We used a validated food-frequency questionnaire to assess diet, with adjustment for several potentially important confounding variables including total energy and dietary fat intakes, and incorporated the most recently updated values for carotenoid content of fruit and vegetables. Ascertainment with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registries ensured that few cases were missed, and the use of population controls minimized some of the biases associated with hospital-based case-control studies. Furthermore, our analyses compared 2 methods of adjustment for total energy, given the reported differences in effect estimates across methods when the categorical form of the dietary variable is used (52, 53). Some differences were noted across methods for those variables that appeared to have higher correlations with total energy intake. In instances where the true associations between diet and disease are unknown, correlated errors may lead to distortion of the underlying associations (30). Our findings suggest that the nutrient residual method may circumvent these problems, as reported elsewhere (30).

Our study also has potential limitations. First, our response was low. However, we found similar distributions in demographic characteristics between the cases and controls in the present analyses compared with all eligible cases and controls, which provided reassurance that the overall low control response did not bias our effect estimates appreciably. Second, as with any case-control design, recall bias is a concern; reassuringly, our findings agree with those from a large cohort study in which diet was assessed prospectively (3). Third, supplemental data were not available for all vitamins and minerals, which may underestimate true associations between some antioxidants and NHL. Finally, some degree of error in the measurement of diet and lifestyle variables is to be expected, and random misclassification of exposure between cases and controls would have attenuated the associations.

These data, in combination with other case-control and cohort studies, suggest that higher intakes of vegetables, in general, and specific nutrients that function in antioxidant-related pathways, in particular, may reduce the risk of developing NHL. If so, dietary change may be one of a small number of modifiable influences on lymphoma risk. Our observation of a stronger link in active persons and in those with diffuse NHL subtypes requires corroboration in other studies. The effect of foods and nutrients may be further clarified within the context of polymorphisms of genes that participate in the repair of oxidative damage.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparison of demographic characteristics between case and control subjects from the National Cancer Institute–Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (1998–2000)

 

   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Jane Curtin and Adam Risch of Information Management Services Inc for performing the data analysis.

JRC, SD, MS, WC, JC, PH, and MHW were involved in the study design. LEK and JRC directed the data analysis. LEK and MHW guided the process for incorporating updated carotenoid values in the analyses. LEK wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. UL was involved in the editing and writing of the manuscript and provided intellectual content. All authors contributed to the final manuscript. None of the authors declared any personal or financial conflict of interest.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program: Incidence - SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2004 Sub (1973-2002). Released April 2005, based on the November 2004 submission. Internet: http://www.seer.cancer.gov (accessed 22 August 2005).
  2. Hoover RN. Lymphoma risks in populations with altered immunity –a search for a mechanism. Cancer Res 1992;52:5477S–8S.
  3. Zhang SM, Hunter DJ, Rosner BA, et al. Intakes of fruits, vegetables, and related nutrients and the risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:477–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chang ET, Smedby KE, Zhang SM, et al. Dietary factors and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:512–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Zheng T, Holford TR, Leaderer B, et al. Diet and nutrient intakes and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Connecticut women. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:454–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ward MH, Zahm SH, Weisenburger DD, et al. Dietary factors and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Nebraska (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1994;5:422–32.[Medline]
  7. Chiu BC, Cerhan JR, Folsom AR, et al. Diet and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in older women. JAMA 1996;275:1315–21.[Abstract]
  8. Franceschi S, Serraino D, Carbone A, Talamini R, La Vecchia C. Dietary factors and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a case-control study in northeastern part of Italy. Nutr Cancer 1989;12:333–41.[Medline]
  9. Purdue MP, Bassani DG, Klar NS, Sloan M, Kreiger N, and the Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Dietary factors and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by histologic subtype: a case-control analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1665–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Negri E, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, D’Avanzo B, Parazzini F. Vegetable and fruit consumption and cancer risk. Int J Cancer 1991;48:350–4.[Medline]
  11. De Stefani E, Fierro L, Barrios E, Ronco A. Tobacco, alcohol, diet and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a case-control study in Uruguay. Leuk Res 1998;22:445–52.[Medline]
  12. Tavani A, Pregnolato A, Negri E, et al. Diet and risk of lymphoid neoplasms and soft tissue sarcomas. Nutr Cancer 1997;27:256–60.[Medline]
  13. Zhang SM, Giovannucci EL, Hunter DJ, et al. Vitamin supplement use and the risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among women and men. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:1056–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1625–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Chatterjee N, Hartge P, Cerhan JR, et al. Risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and family history of lymphatic, hematologic, and other cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1415–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:453–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Block G, Coyle LM, Hartman AM, Scoppa SM. Revision of dietary analysis software for the Health Habits and History Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:1190–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mangels AR, Holden JM, Beecher GR, Forman MR, Lanza E. Carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables: an evaluation of analytic data. J Am Diet Assoc 1993;93:284–96.[Medline]
  19. Chug-Ahuja JK, Holden JM, Forman MR, Mangels AR, Beecher GR, Lanza E. The development and application of a carotenoid database for fruits, vegetables, and selected multicomponent foods. J Am Diet Assoc 1993;93:318–23.[Medline]
  20. VandenLangenberg GM, Brady WE, Nebeling LC, et al. Influence of using different sources of carotenoid data in epidemiologic studies. J Am Diet Assoc 1996;96:1271–5.[Medline]
  21. Chen H, Ward MH, Graubard BI, et al. Dietary patterns and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and distal stomach. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:137–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ward MH, Sinha R, Heineman EF, et al. Risk of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagus with meat cooking method and doneness preference. Int J Cancer 1997;71:14–9.[Medline]
  23. Cantwell M, Mittl B, Curtin J, et al. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire with a meat-cooking and heterocyclic amine module. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:293–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wright ME, Mayne ST, Swanson CA, Sinha R, Alavanja MC. Dietary carotenoids, vegetables, and lung cancer risk in women: the Missouri women’s health study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:85–96.[Medline]
  25. Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
  26. Dubin N, Pasternak BS. Risk assessment for case-control subgroups by polychotomous logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:1101–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Begg CB, Zhang ZF. Statistical analysis of molecular epidemiology studies employing case-series. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:173–5.[Abstract]
  28. Hosmer DW, Lameshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons Inc, 2000.
  29. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:17–27.[Free Full Text]
  30. Michels KB, Bingham SA, Luben R, Welch AA, Day NE. The effect of correlated measurement error in multivariate models of diet. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:59–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Cross AJ, Ward MH, Schenk MJ, et al. Meat and meat-mutagen intake and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from a NCI-SEER case-control study. Carcinogenesis 2006;27:293–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996;96:1027–39.[Medline]
  33. Blount BC, Mack MM, Wehr CM, et al. Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:3290–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Choi SW, Mason JB. Folate and carcinogenesis: an integrated scheme. J Nutr 2000;130:129–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Steinkellner H, Rabot S, Freywald C, et al. Effects of cruciferous vegetables and their constituents on drug metabolizing enzymes involved in the bioactivation of DNA-reactive dietary carcinogens. Mutat Res 2001;480–1:285–97.
  36. Lim U, Schenk M, Kelemen LE, et al. Dietary determinants of one-carbon metabolism and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: NCI-SEER Case-Control Study (1998–2000). Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:953–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Fowke JH, Chung FL, Jin F, et al. Urinary isothiocyanate levels, brassica, and human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2003;63:3980–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Slattery ML, Kampman E, Samowitz W, Caan BJ, Potter JD. Interplay between dietary inducers of GST and the GSTM-1 genotype in colon cancer. Int J Cancer 2000;87:728–33.[Medline]
  39. Lin HJ, Probst-Hensch NM, Louie AD, et al. Glutathione transferase null genotype, broccoli, and lower prevalence of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:647–52.[Abstract]
  40. Seow A, Yuan JM, Sun CL, Van Den Berg D, Lee HP, Yu MC. Dietary isothiocyanates, glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:2055–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Cohen JH, Kristal AR, Stanford JL. Fruit and vegetable intakes and prostate cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:61–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Verhoeven DT, Goldbohm RA, van Poppel G, Verhagen H, van den Brandt PA. Epidemiological studies on brassica vegetables and cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:733–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Astley SB, Elliott RM. How strong is the evidence that lycopene supplementation can modify biomarkers of oxidative damage and DNA repair in human lymphocytes? J Nutr 2005;135:2071S–3S.[Free Full Text]
  44. Møller P, Loft S. Interventions with antioxidants and nutrients in relation to oxidative DNA damage and repair. Mut Res 2004;551:79–89.[Medline]
  45. Astley SB, Hughes DA, Wright AJ, Elliott RM, Southon S. DNA damage and susceptibility to oxidative damage in lymphocytes: effects of carotenoids in vitro and in vivo. Br J Nutr 2004;91:53–61.[Medline]
  46. Zhang SM, Calle EE, Petrelli JM, Jacobs EJ, Thun MJ. Vitamin supplement use and fatal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among US men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:1064–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Dreosti IE. Zinc and the gene. Mut Res 2001;161–7.
  48. Mocchegiani E, Giacconi R, Muzzioli M, Cipriano C. Zinc, infections and immunosenescence. Mech Aging Dev 2000;121:21–35.
  49. Fraker PJ, King LE, Laakko T, Vollmer TL. The dynamic link between the integrity of the immune system and zinc status. J Nutr 2000;130(suppl):1399S–406S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Prasad AS, Kucuk O. Zinc in cancer prevention. Cancer Metas Rev 2002;21:291–5.[Medline]
  51. Clarkson PM, Thompson HS. Antioxidants: what role do they play in physical activity and health? Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(suppl):637S–46S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm E, et al. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:531–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Potter JD, et al. Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:1092–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication September 20, 2005. Accepted for publication February 28, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
L. M. Morton, S. S. Wang, W. Cozen, M. S. Linet, N. Chatterjee, S. Davis, R. K. Severson, J. S. Colt, M. A. Vasef, N. Rothman, et al.
Etiologic heterogeneity among non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes
Blood, December 15, 2008; 112(13): 5150 - 5160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. L Frankenfeld, J. R Cerhan, W. Cozen, S. Davis, M. Schenk, L. M Morton, P. Hartge, and M. H Ward
Dietary flavonoid intake and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1439 - 1445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
N. D. Riediger and M. H. Moghadasian
Patterns of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and the Influence of Sex, Age and Socio-Demographic Factors among Canadian Elderly
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 27(2): 306 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. F. Skibola
Obesity, Diet and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 392 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. T. Chang, K. M. Balter, A. Torrang, K. E. Smedby, M. Melbye, C. Sundstrom, B. Glimelius, and H.-O. Adami
Nutrient Intake and Risk of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2006; 164(12): 1222 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. H
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. H

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS