|
|
||||||||
Letters to the Editor |
Faculté de Médecine, Institut de Physiologie, Universite de Lausanne, Bugnon 7, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland, E-mail: Eric.Jequier{at}physiol.unil.ch
Dear Sir:
I thank McCarty for his comments on my editorial (1). McCarty emphasizes a sex difference in the relation between daily alcohol energy intake and body weight: in men, there is no clear relation, whereas in women, moderate drinkers tend to be lighter than nondrinkers (2). The paradox that I mentioned, ie, an increased alcohol-induced energy intake without weight gain, is even more evident in women than in men because moderate alcohol intake seems to induce a decrease in body weight in women. If these large cross-sectional epidemiologic surveys (2) are correct, the only explanation for this finding is that a moderate alcohol intake increases energy expenditure in women more so than in men.
How can alcohol intake stimulate energy expenditure? McCarty mentions that cross-sectional studies also show that moderate drinkers are more insulin sensitive than nondrinkers (3, 4). He suggests that down-regulation of diurnal insulin secretion in moderate alcohol drinkers might disinhibit hepatic ketogenesis and gluconeogenesis, which are thermogenic processes. These metabolic explanations are unlikely to be true for the following reasons:
How can we solve the paradox in women of an increased alcohol-induced energy intake associated with a reduced body weight, if alcohol has only a moderate thermogenic effect? A recent paper by Levine et al (9) showed that nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) may play a major role in body weight regulation in response to chronic excesses in energy intake. This type of activity includes strolling around and movements of the limbs with little displacement of the body's center of gravity, ie, various types of activity referred to as fidgeting (10). Levine et al (9) clearly showed that a large portion of the variability in energy storage during an 8-wk overfeeding study in healthy volunteers was accounted for by changes in NEAT. If a moderate alcohol intake activates NEAT, this may be the most likely explanation of the above-cited paradox. Why this alcohol-induced increase in energy expenditure could be more important in women than in men remains to be elucidated.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Meyer, K. M. Conigrave, N.-F. Chu, N. Rifai, D. Spiegelman, M. J. Stampfer, and E. B. Rimm Alcohol Consumption Patterns and HbA1c, C-Peptide and Insulin Concentrations in Men J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2003; 22(3): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |