AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwenk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fätkenheuer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwenk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fätkenheuer, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schwenk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fätkenheuer, G.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 5, 867-873, November 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Bioelectrical impedance analysis in HIV-infected patients treated with triple antiretroviral treatment1,2

Achim Schwenk, Alexander Beisenherz, Gisela Kremer, Volker Diehl, Bernd Salzberger and Gerd Fätkenheuer

1 From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

See corresponding editorial on page 787.

2 Address reprint requests to A Schwenk, Department of Infectious Diseases, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE United Kingdom. E-mail: a.schwenk{at}sghms.ac.uk.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Triple antiretroviral treatment including protease inhibitors (PIs) delays the clinical progression of HIV infection and may thus reduce the risk of malnutrition. However, fat redistribution (lipodystrophy) was recognized recently as a metabolic side effect of PIs.

Objective: The study aimed to assess the effect of triple antiretroviral treatment on body composition and on the prevalence of malnutrition.

Design: Two cross-sectional studies, 1 in 1996 (t96; n = 247) and 1 in 1997 (t97; n = 266), were conducted in HIV-infected outpatients. Among patients who participated in both studies, 111 patients started a new antiretroviral treatment including a PI between t96 and t97 and were studied longitudinally. Total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), and fat mass were estimated by monofrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

Results: Prevalence of malnutrition was reduced by 30–50% from t96 to t97, depending on the definition used. In the longitudinal study, TBW and the ratio between ICW and ECW increased and fat mass decreased (P < 0.001). BIA indicated a greater increase in ICW in 23 (21%) patients with clinically apparent fat redistribution than in patients without this syndrome, but estimates of fat mass changes were not significantly different.

Conclusions: Triple antiretroviral treatment may protect HIV-infected patients against the development of malnutrition. Whole-body BIA data suggest an increase in appendicular body cell mass associated with improved antiretroviral treatment. However, the method is unreliable in detecting fat redistribution, and current prediction equations will need to be recalibrated for HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral treatment.

Key Words: AIDS • anti-HIV agents • body weight • body composition • bioelectrical impedance analysis • BIA • fat redistribution • protease inhibitors • lipodystrophy • malnutrition • wasting syndrome • weight loss • triple antiretroviral treatment • humans


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The introduction of triple antiretroviral treatment including protease inhibitors (PIs) has changed the natural history of HIV infection in industrialized countries in an unprecedented way. Viremia (1, 2), incidence of opportunistic infections (3, 4), and mortality (5) have been reduced efficiently. However, weight data have not been included in most reports of controlled trials of PI treatment (1, 4, 6) and little is known about the effect of such treatment on constitutional symptoms of HIV infection, such as weight loss.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of triple antiretroviral treatment on nutritional status and body composition in a representative sample of HIV-infected patients. A cross-sectional study of the prognostic effect of body composition was conducted in 1996 before the widespread use of triple antiretroviral treatment. The study was repeated in 1997 after the treatment policy changed to include triple antiretroviral treatment. Patients who participated in both studies were followed longitudinally. Nutritional status was assessed by monofrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), a noninvasive technique validated in HIV-infected patients (7) and shown previously to predict clinical outcome (8). Weight trends before and after the introduction of PIs in a malnourished subset of this population were published elsewhere (9).

After the conclusion of this study, characteristic changes in body shape with PI treatment were described by others. Redistribution of body fat stores from subcutaneous to visceral fat was observed in HIV-infected subjects, which is frequently referred to as lipodystrophy syndrome (1012) or fat redistribution syndrome (13). In light of such observations, the focus of the present study was extended to address whether changes in BIA data reflect clinical evidence of fat redistribution.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
The study was conducted in outpatients at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All HIV-antibody-positive outpatients attending the department over two 6-wk periods were asked to participate. Three patients were excluded from the analysis because they received parenteral nutrition for >2 wk. Enteral tube feeding, human growth hormone, and progesterone or androgen derivatives were not prescribed to any patient during the study.

The first period was from March to April 1996 (t96) and the second period was from July to August 1997 (t97). Only data from the patient's first visit during each period were considered for further analysis. For t96, 247 of 254 (97.3%) patients attending the outpatient clinic gave their consent and were eligible to participate in the study; 266 of 276 patients (96.4%) participated in t97.

Of 135 patients who participated in both studies, 111 received a prescription for a new PI between their t96 and t97 assessments. These 111 patients were followed longitudinally for 497 ± 17 d (range: 445–539 d) via monthly body measurements. Body-composition trends before and after the first PI treatment were compared in a subgroup of 53 (48%) of the 111 patients in whom the first PI treatment was given >=60 d after t96 and for whom BIA data were available within 1 wk from this starting date.

Baseline characteristics, CD4+ cell counts, and viral loads of patients in the cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are given in Table 1Go. The participants in the longitudinal study subgroup were significantly older than the patients assessed only at t96, but no other baseline characteristics were significantly different. Previous antiretroviral treatment was highly heterogeneous. In the longitudinal study, 98 (88.3%) patients had received prior treatment (median: 2 regimens; range: 1–7 regimens) for a total duration of 21 mo (range: 1–94 mo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics during the 2 cross-sectional studies conducted in 1996 (t96) and 1997 (t97) and the longitudinal study1
 
Study methods
Whole-body bioelectrical impedance was measured at 50 KHz with a BIA 2000-1 bioimpedance meter (Data Input, Frankfurt, Germany). All measurements were done by the same investigator (AB), using standard electrode positions (14). The relation of the 2 impedance components, reactance (Xc) and resistance (R), was expressed as phase angle {alpha} = (Xc x 180°)/(R x {pi}) (8).

Total body water (TBW), fat-free mass (FFM), and intracellular water (ICW) were estimated from BIA data. We used prediction equations that had been developed in HIV-infected and healthy subjects, with total body potassium, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and 3H2O dilution as reference methods (7), assuming a constant potassium concentration in the ICW of 150 mmol/L (15). Extracellular water (ECW) was calculated as TBW minus ICW, and body fat was calculated as body weight minus FFM. Results are presented as water compartments (TBW, ICW, and ECW) rather than as the corresponding mass compartments (FFM, body cell mass, and extracellular mass) to reduce any bias resulting from abnormal hydration. Results were not significantly different from those presented below when they were calculated by using Segal et al's prediction of FFM (16), Paton et al's prediction of TBW and ICW in HIV-positive men (17), or the manufacturer's unpublished prediction equation, which calculates ICW as TBW x phase angle x constant (18) (data not shown).

Weight, in patients wearing light clothes but no shoes, was measured at every visit with an electronic scale and was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg. The HIV load was assessed at the Institute of Virology, University of Cologne, by using quantitative polymerase chain reaction with a detection limit of 300000 copies/L (Roche Amplicor; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany). Routine methods were used for all other laboratory tests.

Statistics were calculated by using SPSS 7.5 (19). Comparisons were tested with nonparametric methods: Pearson's chi-square was used for dichotomous variables and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for intraindividual and intergroup comparisons of continuous variables. The effect of fat redistribution on the relation between changes in body weight, fat mass, ICW, and ECW was determined with a general linear model.

Because there is no generally accepted definition of malnutrition (20, 21), several definitions were arbitrarily chosen to compare the prevalence of malnutrition in the 2 cross-sectional studies:

  1. the wasting syndrome as defined in the 1993 AIDS case definition (22): weight loss of >10% of body weight in a 3-mo period, together with fever, diarrhea, or both, of unknown origin;
  2. actual body weight <90% of usual weight, as self-reported, preceding the first disease symptoms (23);
  3. current weight loss >5% in a 1-mo period;
  4. actual body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) <19 (24);
  5. phase angle {alpha} <5.3° by BIA (which is the lower quartile of the t96 sample, see Discussion); and
  6. ICW:ECW <0.83, analogous to the proposed ratio of extracellular and body cell mass of >1.2 (25).

Cases with fat redistribution between t96 and t97 were identified retrospectively by a dietitian (GK) and 2 physicians (BS and GF) from the outpatient department, who were blinded to the BIA data but had been continuously involved in the clinical care of the patients throughout the study period. Fat redistribution was defined as either a disproportionate increase in abdominal girth in a patient who was weight stable or lost weight, or a visible reduction in subcutaneous fat in the extremities or face irrespective of weight changes during the time period between t96 and t97. Objective measurement of fat mass distribution was not available in this study, which was planned before recognition of the fat redistribution syndrome.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
During the time between the 2 cross-sectional studies, the antiretroviral treatment policy in the department changed considerably. At t96, only 17 patients (7%) had been treated with a PI, all having received saquinavir (Invirase; Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) for a mean (±SD) of 155 ± 163 d. By t97, 171 patients (64%) were receiving treatment including a PI, with a mean (±SD) treatment duration of 187 ± 126 d. The PIs used at t97 were indinavir (Crixivan; Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ), ritonavir (Norvir; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago), saquinavir, and nelfinavir (Viracept; Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, La Jolla, CA) in 75, 48, 25, and 23 patients, respectively. Eight additional patients had taken a PI for 38 ± 73 d but had discontinued treatment before t97. Other components of antiretroviral treatment changed as well. For example, the number of patients taking the nucleoside analogue lamivudine (Epivir; Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) increased from 26 (10%) at t96 to 197 (74%) at t97.

The prevalence of malnutrition was lower at t97 than at t96 according to most of the definitions of malnutrition (Figure 1Go). Differences in prevalence between t96 and t97 were largest for definitions based on the percentage loss from usual body weight and on BIA data (definitions 2, 5, and 6). Nonsignificant trends toward a lower prevalence of wasting syndrome and of current weight loss in t97 were observed (definitions 1 and 3). The distribution of BIA results and BMI at t96 and t97 is shown in Table 2Go. Patients participating in the t97 study had a higher BMI, lower resistance and reactance, and higher phase angle than did patients participating in the t96 study. These data resulted in significantly higher estimates of TBW, ICW, and ECW; lower estimates of body fat; and a higher ECW:ICW ratio in t97 than in t96 patients.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Prevalence of malnutrition in HIV-infected outpatients in 2 time periods: April to May 1996 (white bars; n = 247) and July to August 1997 (black bars; n = 266). For wasting syndrome, the black and striped bars indicate a diagnosis <=and >1 y before the assessment, respectively. Significance was determined by chi-square test. UBW, usual body weight; ICW, intracellular water; ECW, extracellular water.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Differences in weight and body-composition values between the 1996 (t96) and 1997 (t97) cross-sectional studies1
 
These changes were partly explained by demographic shifts in the population studied. Those patients in the t96 study who also participated in the t97 study (n = 135) entered the t96 study with a higher BMI and phase angle than did patients who died (n = 36) or who were lost to follow-up (n = 76) between t96 and t97 (P < 0.02). This was explained by the association between the lowest quartile of phase angle (<5.3°) at t96 and higher mortality (A Schwenk et al, unpublished data, 1999). Furthermore, CD4+ cell counts in patients who participated in t97 only were 255 ± 224 x106/L during 1996 and 320 ± 273 x 106/L during 1997 (P < 0.01), possibly because antiretroviral treatment tends to be started earlier now in the course of infection (26). Other clinical data with potential effects on the prevalence of malnutrition are given in Table 1Go. Patients in the t97 study had a lower viral load and higher CD4+ cell counts than did those in the t96 study (P < 0.001), but the incidence of opportunistic infections in the preceding year was not significantly different.

In the longitudinal study of patients commencing PI treatment, marked changes in bioelectrical impedance were observed. Both resistance and reactance decreased and the phase angle increased (resistance: from 572 ± 78 to 502 ± 70 {Omega}; reactance: from 59 ± 9 to 55 ± 9 {Omega}; and phase angle: from 5.9 ± 0.7 to 6.3 ± 0.8°; P < 0.001 for all). BIA estimates of body composition showed a significant gain in TBW and a loss of body fat mass (Figure 2Go). ICW:ECW increased from 1.12 ± 0.15 to 1.16 ± 0.16 (P < 0.001).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Changes in body-composition estimates in HIV-infected patients (n = 111) from 1996 (t96) to 1997 (t97) before and during treatment with protease inhibitors. The box and whisker plot show the median (horizontal line), interquartile range (box: contains 50% of all values), outlier (whiskers: contain values outside of the interquartile range, excluding extreme values), and extreme (diamonds: >3.5 interquartile ranges different from the median) values. Mean (±SD) changes from t96 to t97 are indicated below the panels. Significance was determined by using paired Mann-Whitney U tests. TBW, total body water; ICW, intracellular water; ECW, extracellular water.

 
However, these changes seem to have begun before PI treatment began. Changes in body weight and BIA before and after the first PI treatment in the 53 patients evaluable in this analysis are given in Table 3Go. Although these patients lost weight before and gained weight after the first PI dose, the phase angle increased likewise before and after this date. On the basis of BIA data, weight loss before PI treatment began was mainly due to a loss in fat mass, whereas weight gain after the first PI dose occurred mainly in the water compartments. Similar results were obtained when changes were calculated as trends (kg/d or °/d, data not shown). The subset of 53 patients analyzed for these changes was not representative of the 111 patients studied longitudinally. This subset of 53 patients tended to have lost more weight before their first PI dose and gained more weight afterward (before PI: -0.1 ± 4.0 compared with 1.0 ± 3.7 kg, P = 0.17; after PI: 1.9 ± 5.3 compared with -1.0 ± 2.6 kg, P < 0.001) than did the other patients and were also more likely to receive nutritional counseling [27 of 53 (51%) compared with 19 of 58 (33%) patients, P < 0.05].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Changes in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) data before and after the first treatment with a protease inhibitor (PI)1
 
Fat redistribution syndrome was identified by retrospective clinical observation of 23 of the 111 patients (20.7%) in the longitudinal study. It was associated with an increased phase angle and increased estimates of ICW but not of body fat or ECW (Table 4Go). In a general linear model with weight change and fat redistribution as independent variables and change in ICW as the dependent variable, patients with fat redistribution syndrome had a significantly higher ICW at every level of weight gain than patients without the syndrome. In contrast, similar models with ECW change or fat mass change as dependent variables showed no influence of fat redistribution on the regression between changes in the compartment and in weight (P = 0.49 and P = 0.18 for ECW and body fat, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Comparison of changes from t96 to t97 in bioelectrical impedance analysis results, body weight, and serum lipids between patients with and without fat redistribution syndrome1
 
Virologic and immunologic outcome criteria of antiretroviral treatment were not significantly associated with changes in TBW or ICW:ECW between t96 and t97. Criteria tested for this were the extent and duration of reduction in HIV viremia, an increase in CD4+ cells, and the duration of time that CD4+cell counts were >50 x 106/L. Patients who began taking 1 or 2 other new antiviral medications at the same time as beginning PI treatment had a greater increase in ICW:ECW than did patients who began taking a PI as part of an existing regimen (0.05 ± 0.08 compared with 0.02 ± 0.06, P = 0.03). Otherwise, no influence on changes in TBW or ICW:ECW was identified on the basis of the antiretroviral drug combination, the duration of PI treatment between t96 and t97, the number of previous treatment regimens, or the time since antiretroviral treatment began.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the 2 cross-sectional studies, a marked reduction in the prevalence of malnutrition in HIV-infected outpatients was observed between spring 1996 and autumn 1997 (Figure 1Go). About 33% fewer patients were found to be underweight when compared with their usual body weight or with BMI standards, and the prevalence of malnutrition on the basis of BIA criteria decreased by >50% between t96 and t97.

In the patients followed longitudinally, BIA data suggest a mean increase in TBW of 2.3 L and a loss in body fat of 1.5 kg (Figure 2Go). Moreover, the increase in TBW appeared to consist predominantly of ICW. This observation contrasts with the findings of longitudinal studies in HIV-infected patients before the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment, in which decreases in ICW:ECW and body cell mass were observed consistent with a chronic catabolic illness (27, 28).

How much of such an improvement in body composition can be attributed to the new antiretroviral therapies? Although it has been proposed that the HIV viral load itself contributes to the pathogenesis of wasting (29, 30), improvements in viral load and immune function with the new therapies were not correlated with changes determined by BIA in our study. Weight gain was documented previously in patients receiving PI treatment (31, 32; A Teixeira, JC Leu, P Honderlick, A Trylesinski, D Zucman, unpublished observations, 1997). Two smaller studies of body composition during PI treatment had conflicting results, one showing increased body cell mass (D Berger, G Bucher, P Cimoch, et al, unpublished observations, 1997) and the other showing predominantly fat gain (33). In our study, BIA indexes showed an improving trend even before the first PI dose. In a malnourished subset of the same population, we showed previously that weight trends were similar 100 d before and 200 d after the first PI treatment (9). An explanation for this finding is that the loss in body fat may have balanced the gain in FFM. Alternatively, previous changes in antiretroviral treatment may have improved body composition by reducing morbidity (5).

A new pattern of body fat redistribution was observed recently in HIV-infected patients: an increase in visceral fat and a decrease in subcutaneous fat (10, 12). Hyperlipoproteinemia and insulin resistance are regular features of the syndrome (12, 34). There is controversy about whether it represents a side effect of PI treatment on lipid metabolism (35) or whether it is related to improved antiretroviral control irrespective of the drugs used (13, 36, 37). In the present study, BIA showed a similar pattern of improvement in body composition in patients with and without a clinical diagnosis of fat redistribution (Table 4Go). Moreover, fat redistribution was associated with an increase in ICW adjusted for weight changes. In contrast, changes in body fat estimates from BIA were independent of fat redistribution.

Two contrasting interpretations of these data are as follows. First, fat redistribution may introduce a systematic bias into BIA estimates of TBW and its components. Alternatively, the results of BIA may represent a true increase in TBW and ICW:ECW, which might result from a gain in appendicular muscle mass because of improved antiretroviral control and reduced catabolic drive.

The first interpretation is based on limitations of the BIA method that are not always appreciated. Measured whole-body impedance is determined predominantly (>90%) by the impedance of the limbs, even though the limbs contain <50% of TBW (38). An apparent increase in TBW may therefore be due to redistribution of TBW from the trunk to the extremities. BIA is unreliable for estimating total body fat (39) because the electrical current mainly passes through FFM, and fat mass is calculated by subtraction. Whole-body BIA does not assess regional body composition, in contrast with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (40) and, perhaps, segmental BIA (41, 42). Finally, loss of intramuscular fat could potentially alter the dispersion of the electrical current within the muscle and thus the phase angle. For all these reasons, empirical prediction equations for body composition from BIA may no longer be valid in populations of HIV-infected patients with a high incidence of fat redistribution. Because BIA is often used in this setting for clinical monitoring and research, new validation studies are warranted.

The second interpretation relied on the finding that an improved phase angle was already observed before PI treatment began. Because fat redistribution was not observed in any patient before the first PI dose, it is unlikely that the changes detected with BIA were entirely attributable to fat redistribution. As discussed above, BIA mostly detects changes in appendicular body mass. Increased TBW estimates and an increased ICW:ECW may therefore be best interpreted as a gain in appendicular muscle mass. BIA estimates of body cell mass are well correlated with muscular performance (43, 44). Suppression of the catabolic effects of viremia, decreased incidence of opportunistic infections, or increased physical activity of patients are plausible explanations for a gain in appendicular muscle mass in patients receiving successful antiretroviral treatment.

Even though the biological correlate of impedance is incompletely understood, a decreased phase angle has predicted mortality in HIV-infected subjects not receiving PI treatment, independent of CD4+ cell count (8, 45). A similar prognostic effect of phase angle was found in our study population (A Schwenk et al, unpublished data, 1999). Apart from its correlation with the ICW:ECW, the phase angle may be interpreted as a global marker for cell membrane integrity (8, 46).

Some limitations of the study should be considered. Cases of fat redistribution syndrome were identified retrospectively by clinical judgement, not by anthropometric assessment. Although clinical judgement correlates well with objective criteria (47), the study could not provide valid data about the prevalence of the syndrome. The longitudinal study excluded patients who died or were lost to follow-up between t96 and t97 or who did not start PI treatment between these 2 time points. Therefore, malnourished patients from the t96 sample were underrepresented and PI-unrelated effects could be detected. Comparison of trends before and after the first PI dose must consider a bias in the evaluable subgroup toward patients undergoing nutritional counseling.

This study may have important implications for clinical research and care. Researchers planning controlled trials of antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected patients are encouraged to incorporate weight and body composition as secondary endpoints. In HIV-infected patients, whole-body BIA should not be used to quantify body fat redistribution. Even for TBW and ICW assessment, this method will need recalibration by reference methods in populations receiving highly active antiretroviral treatment. In more general terms, our study provides evidence that, despite its adverse effects, highly active antiretroviral treatment may protect HIV-infected patients against malnutrition.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Leigh C Ward (University of Queensland, Australia), Nick IJ Paton (Center of Communicable Disease, Singapore), and Derek Macallan (Department of Infectious Diseases, St George's Hospital Medical School, London) for their advice and discussion about the BIA method and their interpretation of the data.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD, et al. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic milliliter or less. N Engl J Med 1997;337:725–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gulick RM, Mellors JW, Havlir D. Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 1997;337:734–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Detels R, Munoz A, McFarlane G, et al. Effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy on time to AIDS and death in men with known HIV infection duration. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Investigators. JAMA 1998;280:1497–503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Palella FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1998;338:853–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hogg RS, Heath KV, Yip B, et al. Improved survival among HIV-infected individuals following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. JAMA 1998;279:450–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Markowitz M, Saag M, Powderly WG, et al. A preliminary study of ritonavir, an inhibitor of HIV-1 protease, to treat HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1534–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kotler DP, Burastero S, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr. Prediction of body cell mass, fat-free mass, and total body water with bioelectrical impedance analysis: effects of race, sex, and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64(suppl):489S–97S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ott M, Fischer H, Polat H, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a predictor of survival in patients with the human immunodeficiency virus—infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retroviral 1995;9:20–5.[Medline]
  9. Schwenk A, Kremer G, Cornely O, Diehl V, Fätkenheuer G, Salzberger B. Body weight changes with protease inhibitor treatment in undernourished HIV-infected patients. Nutrition 1999;15:453–7.[Medline]
  10. Miller KD, Jones E, Yanovski JA, Shankar R, Feuerstein I, Falloon J. Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir. Lancet 1998;351:871–5.[Medline]
  11. Viraben R, Aquilina C. Indinavir-associated lipodystrophy. AIDS 1998;12:F37–9.[Medline]
  12. Carr A, Samaras K, Burton S. A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS 1998;12:F51–8.[Medline]
  13. Kotler DP. Update on lipid abnormalities and cardiovascular complications in HIV infection. World Wide Web: http://www.medscape.com/Medscape/HIV/ TreatmentUpdate/1998/tu05/public/toc-tu05.html (accessed 21 April 1999).
  14. Dunbar C, Melahrinides E, Michielli D, Kalinski M. Effects of small errors in electrode placement on body composition assessment by bioelectrical impedance. Res Q Exerc Sport 1994;65:291–4.[Medline]
  15. Moore FD, Oleson KH, McMurray JD, Parker HV, Boyden CM. The body cell mass and its supporting environment: body composition in health and disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1963.
  16. Segal KR, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald PI, Hodgdon JA, Van Itallie TB. Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a four-site cross-validation study. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;47:7–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Paton NI, Elia M, Jennings G, Ward LC, Griffin GE. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in human immunodeficiency virus–infected patients: comparison of single frequency with multifrequency, spectroscopy and other novel approaches. Nutrition 1998;14:658–66.[Medline]
  18. Data Input. NUTRI4 handbook. Frankfurt, Germany: Data Input GmbH, 1997.
  19. Norusis MJ. SPSS advanced statistics, 7.0 update. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 1996.
  20. Jeejeebhoy KN. Nutrient requirements and nutrient deficiencies in gastrointestinal diseases. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS, eds. Gastrointestinal disease—pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 5th ed. Vol 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993:2017–47.
  21. Souba WW. Drug therapy: nutritional support. N Engl J Med 1997;336:41–8.[Free Full Text]
  22. Centers for Disease Control. 1993 Revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992;41:1–19.
  23. Roubenoff R, Roubenoff RA, Preto J, Balke CW. Malnutrition among hospitalized patients. A problem of physician awareness. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1462–5.[Abstract]
  24. Andres R, Elahi D, Tobin JD, Muller DC, Brant L. Impact of age on weight goals. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:1030–3.
  25. Shizgal HM. Validation of the measurement of body composition from whole body bioelectrical impedance. Infusionstherapie 1990; 17(suppl):67–74.
  26. Carpenter CC, Fischl MA, Hammer SM, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997. Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society—USA panel. JAMA 1997;277:1962–9.[Abstract]
  27. Mulligan K, Tai VW, Schambelan M. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of body composition in men with HIV infection. J AIDS 1997;15:43–8.
  28. Kotler DP, Wang J, Pierson RN. Body composition studies in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:1255–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rivera S, Briggs W, Qian D, Sattler F. HIV RNA levels correlate with prior weight loss. Fifth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Chicago, 1998. World Wide Web: http://www.retroconference.org/abs/absset.htm (accessed 21 April 1999) (abstr).
  30. Shevitz A, Spiegelman DL, French JK, et al. Increased resting energy expenditure (REE) is associated with increased plasma HIV RNA. 12th World AIDS Conference, Geneva, 1998. World Wide Web: http://www.aids98.ch (accessed 21 April 1999).
  31. Carbonnel F, Maslo C, Beaugerie L, et al. Effect of indinavir on HIV-related wasting. AIDS 1998;12:1777–84.[Medline]
  32. Melvin AJ, Mohan KM, Arcuino LA, Edelstein RE, Frenkel LM. Clinical, virologic and immunologic responses of children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease treated with protease inhibitors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:968–74.[Medline]
  33. Silva M, Skolnik PR, Gorbach SL, et al. The effect of protease inhibitors on weight and body composition in HIV-infected patients. AIDS 1998;12:1645–51.[Medline]
  34. Mulligan K, Tai VW, Algren H, Chernoff DN, Lo JC, Schambelan M. Evidence of unique metabolic effects of protease inhibitors. Fifth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Chicago, 1998. World Wide Web: http://www.retroconference.org/abs/abset.htm (accessed 21 April 1999) (abstr).
  35. Carr A, Samaras K, Chisholm DJ, Cooper DA. Hypothesis: pathogenesis of HIV-1-protease inhibitor—associated peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance. Lancet 1998;352:1881–3.
  36. Lo JC, Mulligan K, Tai VW, Algren H, Schambelan M. "Buffalo hump" in men with HIV-1 infection. Lancet 1998;351:867–70.[Medline]
  37. Gervasoni C, Ridolfo AL, Trifirò G, et al. Redistribution of body fat in HIV infected women undergoing combined antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 1999;13:465–71.[Medline]
  38. Foster KR, Lukaski HC. Whole-body impedance—what does it measure? Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64(suppl):388S–96S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wang J, Kotler DP, Russell M, et al. Body-fat measurement in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: which method should be used? Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56:963–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Prior BM, Cureton KJ, Modlesky CM, et al. In vivo validation of whole body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol 1997;83:623–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Pietrobelli A, Morini P, Battistini N, Chiumello G, Nunez C, Heymsfield SB. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: prediction from multiple frequency segmental bioimpedance analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52:507–11.[Medline]
  42. Organ L, Bradham G, Gore D, Lozier S. Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis: theory and application of a new technique. J Appl Physiol 1994;77:98–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Schambelan M, Mulligan K, Grunfeld C, et al. Serostim Study Group. Recombinant human growth hormone in patients with HIV-associated wasting—a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:873–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Varlet-Marie E, Brun JF, Blachon C, Orsetti A. Relations entre la composition corporelle mesurée par impedancemetrie et la performance motrice sur ergocycle. (Relationships between body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance and exercise performance on cycloergometer.) Sci Sports 1997;12:204–6 (in French).
  45. Süttmann U, Ockenga J, Selberg O, Hoogestraat L, Deicher H, Müller M. Incidence and prognostic value of malnutrition in human immunodeficiency virus–infected outpatients. J AIDS 1995;8:239–46.
  46. Schwenk A, Ward LC, Elia M, Scott GM. Bioelectrical impedance analysis predicts outcome in patients with suspected bacteremia. Infection 1998;26:277–82.[Medline]
  47. Carr A, Samaras K, Thorisdottir A, Kaufmann GR, Chisholm DJ, Cooper DA. Diagnosis, prediction, and natural course of HIV-1 protease-inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:2093–9.[Medline]
Received for publication January 14, 1999. Accepted for publication June 21, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
E. Aghdassi, B. Arendt, I. E. Salit, and J. P. Allard
Estimation of Body Fat Mass Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Bioelectric Impedance Analysis, and Anthropometry in HIV-Positive Male Subjects Receiving Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2007; 31(2): 135 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. K Drain, R. Kupka, F. Mugusi, and W. W Fawzi
Micronutrients in HIV-positive persons receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 333 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Shah, C. Whalen, D. P. Kotler, H. Mayanja, A. Namale, G. Melikian, R. Mugerwa, and R. D. Semba
Severity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Is Associated with Decreased Phase Angle, Fat Mass and Body Cell Mass in Adults with Pulmonary Tuberculosis Infection in Uganda
J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 2843 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. Yokoi, H. C. Lukaski, E. O. Uthus, and F. H. Nielsen
Use of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy to Estimate Body Water Distribution in Rats Fed High Dietary Sulfur Amino Acids
J. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 131(4): 1302 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Schwenk, A. Beisenherz, K. Romer, G. Kremer, B. Salzberger, and M. Elia
Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis remains an independent predictive marker in HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2000; 72(2): 496 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. K Hellerstein
The changing face of AIDS: translators needed
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 1999; 70(5): 787 - 788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwenk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fätkenheuer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwenk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fätkenheuer, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schwenk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fätkenheuer, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS