AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Clin Nutr (November 4, 2009). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28432
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Besson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Besson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J
© 2009 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Estimating physical activity energy expenditure, sedentary time, and physical activity intensity by self-report in adults1,2,3

Hervé Besson, Søren Brage, Rupert W Jakes, Ulf Ekelund and Nicholas J Wareham

1 From the Medical Research Council, Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

2 Supported by the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.

3 Address correspondence to H Besson, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 285, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom. E-mail: herve.besson{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.

ABSTRACT

Background: Few questionnaires that assess usual physical activity have been reported to be valid for all different subdimensions of physical activity.

Objective: The objective was to assess the validity and reliability of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ), which assesses usual physical activity (PA) in 4 domains (work, travel, recreation, and domestic life).

Design: Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured for 14 d by using the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique combined with a measure of resting metabolic rate to yield PA energy expenditure (PAEE) in 25 men and 25 women. Simultaneously, intensity of activity was measured by using combined heart rate and movement sensing for 11 d. Repeatability of the RPAQ was assessed in an independent sample of 71 women and 60 men aged 31–57 y.

Results: Estimated TEE and PAEE were significantly associated with criterion measures (TEE: r = 0.67; PAEE: r = 0.39) with mean (±SD) biases of –3452 ± 2025 kJ/d and –13 ± 24 kJ · d–1 · kg–1. The correlation between self-reported and measured time spent was significant for vigorous PA (r = 0.70) and marginally insignificant for sedentary time (r = 0.27, P = 0.06). The mean biases were relatively small for sedentary time and vigorous PA: 0.7 ± 2.8 h/d and + 12 ± 24 min/d, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for repeatability of total PAEE (kJ/d) was 0.76 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The RPAQ is the first questionnaire with demonstrated validity for ranking individuals according to their time spent at vigorous-intensity activity and overall energy expenditure.

Received for publication July 23, 2009. Accepted for publication October 1, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society for Nutrition