AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, L. A
Right arrow Articles by Buchholz, A. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, L. A
Right arrow Articles by Buchholz, A. C
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, L. A
Right arrow Articles by Buchholz, A. C
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 87, No. 3, 600-607, March 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Visceral adipose tissue and the ratio of visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue are greater in adults with than in those without spinal cord injury, despite matching waist circumferences1,2,3

Lesley A Edwards, Joanne M Bugaresti and Andrea C Buchholz

1 From the Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (LAE and ACB), and the Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program at Chedoke Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada (JMB)

Background: Abdominal obesity, particularly visceral adipose tissue (VAT), is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Despite an elevated risk of CHD mortality in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), neither abdominal adipose tissue accumulation nor the validity of waist circumference (WC) has been determined in persons with SCI.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare total adipose tissue (TAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and the ratio of VAT to SAT (VAT:SAT) between adults with SCI and age-, sex-, and WC-matched able-bodied (AB) controls and to determine the relation between WC and VAT in both groups.

Design: Thirty-one men and women (n = 15 SCI and 16 AB) with a mean (±SD) age of 38.9 ± 7.9 y participated in this cross-sectional study. Abdominal adipose tissue was quantified by computed tomography at L4-L5. WC was measured at 3 sites: lowest rib, iliac crest, and the midpoint between the lowest rib and iliac crest.

Results: Persons with SCI had a 58% greater mean VAT (P = 0.003), 48% greater mean VAT:SAT (P = 0.034), and 26% greater mean TAT (P = 0.055) than did matched AB controls after differences in weight were accounted for. Mean SAT was not significantly different between groups. WC at all sites was correlated with VAT in both groups (SCI: 0.905 ≤ r ≤ 0.925; AB: 0.838 ≤ r ≤ 0.877; both P < 0.001).

Conclusions: High levels of VAT exist in young people with SCI who classify themselves as active and healthy. WC may be a valid surrogate measure of VAT in this population and serve as a tool for clinicians to identify those at risk of CHD.

Key Words: Visceral adipose tissue • waist circumference • spinal cord injury • computed tomography • coronary heart disease







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition