AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F X.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 4, 809-816, April 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Validation of a 3-dimensional photonic scanner for the measurement of body volumes, dimensions, and percentage body fat1,2,3

Jack Wang, Dympna Gallagher, John C Thornton, Wen Yu, Mary Horlick and F Xavier Pi-Sunyer

1 From the Body Composition Unit, Obesity Research Center, St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY

Background: The 3-dimensional photonic scan (3DPS) technique has been used during the past decade in the fashion industry and for epidemiologic surveys to estimate human body sizes.

Objective: The objective of the study was to validate the accuracy of a recently developed 3DPS (C9036-02; Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Hamamatsu, Japan) for the measurement of body volume, circumferences, lengths, and percentage body fat with the use of underwater weighing (UWW) and tape measures as criterion methods.

Design: Ninety-two subjects (44 females and 48 males) aged 6–83 y and weighing 23–182 kg (52–400 lbs) participated in the study. The subjects were measured while they wore minimal clothing and a head cap. Similar measurements were performed on a mannequin with and without clothing

Results: All subjects were measured with 3DPS and a tape measure; 63 subjects underwent UWW and residual lung volume measurements. The values obtained with 3DPS were slightly but significantly greater than those obtained with UWW for body volume (81.9 ± 4.0 L compared with 81.5 ± 4.0 L, P < 0.0001) and those obtained with a tape measure for circumferences (P < 0.001), but the values for percentage body fat were not significantly different between 3DPS and UWW (P = 0.648). The values obtained with 3DPS were significantly greater than those obtained by UWW and a tape measure for the clothed mannequin, but the values were not uniformly significantly different for the mannequin without clothing.

Conclusions: The 3DPS measures body volume, circumferences, and length rapidly and accurately. However, to generate an accurate total-body volume measurement with 3DPS to estimate percentage body fat, the subjects must wear close-fitting minimal clothing and be able to stand motionless for 10 s (normal scan mode) while holding their breath, which is done immediately after a maximum expiration.

Key Words: Body composition • 3-dimensional photonic scan • body volume • body dimension • body image




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. B. Heymsfield, D. Childers, J. Beetsch, D. B. Allison, and A. Pietrobelli
Body size and human energy requirements: reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure in tall adults
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1543 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition