AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walrand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boirie, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walrand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boirie, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walrand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boirie, Y.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 74, No. 5, 670-678, November 2001
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Original Research Communication

Specific and nonspecific immune responses to fasting and refeeding differ in healthy young adult and elderly persons1,2,3

Stéphane Walrand, Karine Moreau, Florence Caldefie, Arlette Tridon, Jacques Chassagne, Geneviève Portefaix, Luc Cynober, Bernard Beaufrère, Marie-Paule Vasson and Yves Boirie

From the Laboratoire de Biochimie, Biologie Moléculaire et Nutrition and the Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, and the Unité du Métabolisme Protéino-Energétique, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France; the Laboratoire de Biologie de la Nutrition, Faculté de Pharmacie, Paris; and the Laboratoire d'Immunologie and the Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Centre anti-cancéreux Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Background: Undernutrition is a main cause of immunodeficiency. Many confounding factors limit the interpretation of immune function in hospitalized elderly patients.

Objective: We compared the effects of short-term fasting and refeeding on lymphocyte subset distribution and neutrophil function in healthy subjects.

Design: Seven young adult ( ± SE age: 24 ± 2 y) and 8 elderly (71 ± 3 y) subjects were fed standardized diets (1.6 x predicted resting energy expenditure; 16% protein) for 7 d. They then fasted for 36 h and were refed for 4 h (42 kJ/kg). Lymphocyte subsets were quantified by using fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. Neutrophil chemotactic migration was evaluated by using a 2-compartment chamber. Neutrophil reactive oxygen species production was measured by using a luminol-amplified chemiluminescence assay and oxidation of 2'7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate.

Results: Baseline total and cytotoxic T lymphocyte subpopulations were lower in elderly than in adult subjects (P < 0.01). Nutritional state had a significant effect (P < 0.05) on total, helper, and cytotoxic T and B lymphocyte counts in all subjects, and the response of lymphocyte subpopulations to nutritional fluctuations was significantly affected by age. The chemotactic index was lowered by fasting in both groups (P < 0.05 compared with basal values). After refeeding, neutrophil migration was restored in adult but not elderly subjects. The superoxide anion production rate increased with fasting and reverted to prefasting values with refeeding in both groups (P < 0.05). Fasting induced a significant decrease in hydrogen peroxide production in stimulated neutrophils that was reversed by refeeding in adult but not elderly subjects.

Conclusion: The lack of response of lymphocyte subpopulation counts and neutrophil function to nutritional changes may help to explain the proneness of elderly persons to infection.

Key Words: Aging • lymphocyte subsets • neutrophil • fasting • refeeding • elderly • infection






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Nutrition