AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sievenpiper, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sievenpiper, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sievenpiper, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 73, No. 3, 567-573, March 2001
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Simple skinfold-thickness measurements complement conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose tolerance1,2,3

John L Sievenpiper, David JA Jenkins, Robert G Josse, Lawrence A Leiter and Vladimir Vuksan

1 From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and the Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, and the Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto.

Background: Skinfold-thickness measurements are considered to have limited clinical utility.

Objective: To assess whether skinfold-thickness measurements may be a useful adjunct to conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose and insulin regulation, we studied responses to replicate 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance tests (OGTTs) and performed simple anthropometry in a cross section of subjects.

Design: Thirty-five subjects completed the study: 11 lean [mean (±SEM) age: 33 ± 3.2 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2): 24.1 ± 0.8; and percentage body fat (%BF): 11.5 ± 1.5%], 12 normal-weight (age: 33 ± 2.9 y; BMI: 23.9 ± 0.7; and %BF: 24.3.5 ± 1.3%), and 12 obese (age: 41 ± 4.5 y; BMI: 34.5 ± 1.7; and %BF: 34.2 ± 1.5%) individuals. The lean and normal-weight groups were selected to have similar BMIs but different %BFs. We measured the participants' heights, weights, %BFs, waist circumferences, hip circumferences, and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses. Subjects received nine 75-g OGTTs and blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Mean plasma glucose and insulin values were used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index.

Results: The obese group had higher plasma glucose concentrations and areas under the curve (AUCs) than did the normal-weight or lean group and higher plasma insulin concentrations and AUCs than did the lean group (P < 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression, with adjustment for demographic and anthropometric measurements, identified the following predictors: waist circumference, peripheral skinfold thickness, and BMI for fasting plasma glucose (partial R2 = 0.20, 0.13, and 0.13, P < 0.05); waist circumference and truncal skinfold thickness for plasma glucose AUC (partial R2 = 0.20 and 0.13, P < 0.05); age, waist-to-hip ratio, and peripheral skinfold thickness for fasting plasma insulin (partial R2 = 0.26, 0.22, and 0.15, P < 0.05); truncal skinfold thickness for plasma insulin AUC (partial R2 = 0.41, P < 0.001); and peripheral skinfold thickness for both 2-h plasma glucose (partial R2 = 0.59, P < 0.001) and the insulin sensitivity index (partial R2 = 0.49, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Skinfold-thickness measurements may complement other established measurements for predicting abnormal glucose and insulin regulation.

Key Words: Glycemia • insulinemia • oral-glucose-tolerance test • anthropometry • body composition • skinfold thickness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Y. Chen, D. Rennie, Y. F Cormier, and J. Dosman
Waist circumference is associated with pulmonary function in normal-weight, overweight, and obese subjects
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 35 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
Y. Chen, D. Rennie, Y. Cormier, and J. Dosman
Sex Specificity of Asthma Associated With Objectively Measured Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference: The Humboldt Study
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 3048 - 3054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. M Hendricks, K. R Dong, A. M Tang, B. Ding, D. Spiegelman, M. N Woods, and C. A Wanke
High-fiber diet in HIV-positive men is associated with lower risk of developing fat deposition
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2003; 78(4): 790 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. R Boye, T. Dimitriou, F. Manz, E. Schoenau, C. Neu, S. Wudy, and T. Remer
Anthropometric assessment of muscularity during growth: estimating fat-free mass with 2 skinfold-thickness measurements is superior to measuring midupper arm muscle area in healthy prepubertal children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2002; 76(3): 628 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Nutrition