|
|
||||||||
Original Research Communication |
1 From the Departments of Human Biology and Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Background: An easy and cheap method for validating reported energy intake (EI) is needed.
Objective: Reported EI was compared with calculated energy expenditure (EEcalc) and with energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method (EEDLW).
Design: EE was calculated on the basis of basal metabolic rate (BMR) measured with the ventilated-hood technique and physical activity (PA) measured with a triaxial accelerometer (EEVH+PA) and on the basis of BMR estimated by using World Health Organization equations and PA (EEWHO+PA): EEcalc = -1.259 + 1.55 x BMR + 0.076 x counts/min (r2 = 0.90, P = 0.0001). Subjects [n = 12 men and 12 women aged 60 ± 3 y; body mass index (in kg/m2): 26 ± 4] reported their food intakes for 7 d and EEDLW, EEVH+PA, and EEWHO+PA were assessed over the same 7 d.
Results: Reported EI (9.0 ± 2.1 MJ/d) was lower (P < 0.0001) than were EEDLW (11.3 ± 2.3 MJ/d), EEVH+PA (10.8 ± 1.7 MJ/d), and EEWHO+PA (10.8 ± 1.8 MJ/d). Underreporting was 19.4 ± 14.0%, 16.7 ± 13.6%, and 16.4 ± 15.5% on the basis of EEDLW, EEVH+PA, and EEWHO+PA, respectively. The difference of 2.7 ± 8.0% between EEDLW and EEVH+PA was not related to the average of both percentages and was not significantly different from zero. The percentage of underreporting calculated with EEWHO+PA was not significantly different from that calculated with EEDLW.
Conclusions: The use of a combination of BMR (measured or estimated) and PA is a good method for validating reported EI. There was no significant difference between the percentage of underreporting calculated with EEVH+PA, EEWHO+PA, or EEDLW.
Key Words: Energy intake energy expenditure triaxial accelerometer doubly labeled water basal metabolic rate physical activity elderly underreporting underrecording
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Duval, I. Strychar, M.-J. Cyr, D. Prud'homme, R. Rabasa-Lhoret, and E. Doucet Physical activity is a confounding factor of the relation between eating frequency and body composition Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2008; 88(5): 1200 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Heinen, C. van der Vleuten, M. J. M. de Rooij, C. J. T. Uden, A. W. M. Evers, and T. van Achterberg Physical Activity and Adherence to Compression Therapy in Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers Arch Dermatol, October 1, 2007; 143(10): 1283 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pitta, T. Troosters, V. S. Probst, M. A. Spruit, M. Decramer, and R. Gosselink Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD. Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1040 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Joosen, M. Gielen, R. Vlietinck, and K. R Westerterp Genetic analysis of physical activity in twins Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2005; 82(6): 1253 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Donahoo, D. H. Bessesen, D. R. Higbee, S. Lei, G. K. Grunwald, and J. A. Higgins Serum Lithium Concentration Can Be Used to Assess Dietary Compliance in Adults1 J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3133 - 3136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A van Baak, E. van Mil, A. V Astrup, N. Finer, L. F Van Gaal, J. Hilsted, P. G Kopelman, S. Rossner, W P. James, and W. H. Saris Leisure-time activity is an important determinant of long-term weight maintenance after weight loss in the Sibutramine Trial on Obesity Reduction and Maintenance (STORM trial) Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2003; 78(2): 209 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |