AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaumberg, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Hennekens, C. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaumberg, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Hennekens, C. H
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schaumberg, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Hennekens, C. H
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 72, No. 6, 1495-1502, December 2000
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Relations of body fat distribution and height with cataract in men1,2,3

Debra A Schaumberg, Robert J Glynn, William G Christen, Susan E Hankinson and Charles H Hennekens

1 From the Division of Preventive Medicine and the Channing Laboratory of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

Background: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) is a risk factor for cataract, but other anthropometric measurements may also be important.

Objective: We tested relations of alternative measures of body size, including height and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), as well as BMI, with cataract.

Design: This was a prospective follow-up study. We analyzed data from 20271 participants in the Physicians' Health Study who did not have cataract at baseline and for whom there was complete information on weight, height, and other risk factors. For analyses concerning WHR, we excluded 3121 additional men for whom we did not have these measurements, assessed at the ninth year of follow-up. The main outcome measures were incident cataract and cataract surgery.

Results: Among the 17150 men for whom there were complete data, we confirmed an incident cataract in 1727 during an average of 14 y of follow-up. In proportional hazards regression models that adjusted for many known or suspected risk factors, higher BMI [rate ratio (RR) = 1.25 for >=27.8 compared with <22, P for trend = 0.03], height (RR = 1.23 for >=184 cm compared with <=170 cm, P for trend = 0.02), and WHR (RR = 1.31 for top compared with bottom quintile, P for trend = 0.003) were each independently associated with incident cataract.

Conclusions: In addition to BMI, both height and abdominal adiposity are independent risk factors for cataract. These relations are biologically plausible and, if causal, suggest that prevention of obesity and beneficial lifestyle changes resulting in weight loss and reduction of central obesity would lessen the incidence and costs of cataract.

Key Words: Body fat distribution • height • cataract • men • Physicians' Health Study







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Nutrition