American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 68, 372-379, Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Modulation of fecal markers relevant to colon cancer risk: a high- starch Chinese diet did not generate expected beneficial changes relative to a Western-type diet

JG Muir, KZ Walker, MA Kaimakamis, MA Cameron, MJ Govers, ZX Lu, GP Young and K O'Dea
Deakin Institute of Human Nutrition, Deakin University, Malvern, Australia. jane.muir@med.monash.edu.au

In a randomized, crossover dietary intervention study, 12 Australians (of white descent) consumed a diet typical of low-income communities in China and an average Australian diet so that effects on fecal markers thought to be relevant to colon cancer risk could be compared. The Chinese diet contained 35.3 g starch/MJ daily [including 2 g resistant starch (RS)/MJ and 1.5 g nonstarch polysaccharides (NSPs)/MJ]; the Australian diet contained 12 g starch/MJ daily (including 0.8 g RS and 2.7 g NSPs/MJ). Subjects followed each diet for 3 wk. Serum cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower after the low-fat, high-starch Chinese diet than after the Australian diet (mean +/- SEM: 4.17 +/- 0.30 compared with 5.04 +/- 0.28 mmol/L, respectively, P < 0.05), a difference indicative of dietary compliance. Fecal pH was lower after the Chinese diet (6.51 +/- 0.04) than after the Australian diet (6.63 +/- 0.05; P < 0.05). For all other fecal markers examined, however, the Chinese diet produced less favorable changes, including lower fecal bulk (86 +/- 11 compared with 141 +/- 20 g wet wt/d, P < 0.01), slower transit through the gut (69 +/- 6 compared with 56 +/- 7 h, P = 0.06), lower fecal concentrations of short-chain fatty acids [72.8 +/- 7.3 compared with 98 +/- 7.6 mmol/L (including butyrate: 12.2 +/- 1.3 compared with 18.4 +/- 2.3 mmol/L), P < 0.05], and higher fecal concentrations of potentially damaging ammonia (540 +/- 50 compared with 450 +/- 40 mg/L, P < 0.01) and phenols (109.2 +/- 13.2 compared with 68.5 +/- 12.9 mg/L, P < 0.01). These results suggest that consumption of a high-starch diet alone is insufficient to reduce the risk of developing colon cancer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. De Preter, T. Vanhoutte, G. Huys, J. Swings, L. De Vuyst, P. Rutgeerts, and K. Verbeke Effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota, Bifidobacterium breve, and oligofructose-enriched inulin on colonic nitrogen-protein metabolism in healthy humans Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): G358 - G368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. De Preter, T. Coopmans, P. Rutgeerts, and K. Verbeke Influence of Long-Term Administration of Lactulose and Saccharomyces Boulardii on the Colonic Generation of Phenolic Compounds in Healthy Human Subjects J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2006; 25(6): 541 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G Muir, E. G. Yeow, J. Keogh, C. Pizzey, A. R Bird, K. Sharpe, K. O'Dea, and F. A Macrae Combining wheat bran with resistant starch has more beneficial effects on fecal indexes than does wheat bran alone Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 1020 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Behall, J. C. Howe, and R. A. Anderson Apparent Mineral Retention Is Similar in Control and Hyperinsulinemic Men after Consumption of High Amylose Cornstarch J. Nutr., July 1, 2002; 132(7): 1886 - 1891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Topping and P. M. Clifton Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Human Colonic Function: Roles of Resistant Starch and Nonstarch Polysaccharides Physiol Rev, July 1, 2001; 81(3): 1031 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-H. Cheng and M.-H. Lai Fermentation of Resistant Rice Starch Produces Propionate Reducing Serum and Hepatic Cholesterol in Rats J. Nutr., August 1, 2000; 130(8): 1991 - 1995. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. R. Bird, T. Hayakawa, Y. Marsono, J. M. Gooden, I. R. Record, R. L. Correll, and D. L. Topping Coarse Brown Rice Increases Fecal and Large Bowel Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Starch but Lowers Calcium in the Large Bowel of Pigs J. Nutr., July 1, 2000; 130(7): 1780 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text]