AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopkinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hopkinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. O.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 432-438, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Body fat estimation in late pregnancy and early postpartum: comparison of two-, three-, and four-component models

JM Hopkinson, NF Butte, KJ Ellis, WW Wong, MR Puyau and EO Smith
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. judyh@bcm.tmc.edu

Accurate methods for determining body fat mass during reproduction are necessary to evaluate energy balance. However, determination of fat mass is complicated during pregnancy by the accretion of water, which invalidates assumptions underlying standard two-compartment models. The extent to which the variability in body water during pregnancy invalidates use of pregnancy-corrected two-compartment models for determination of fat mass in individual women is unknown. Moreover, it is unclear whether body water returns to nonpregnant values by 2 wk postpartum, which is frequently used as the baseline in studies of postpartum women. The present study uses a four-component model as a criterion for evaluating two- and three-component models. Fifty-six healthy, normotensive women between the ages of 19 and 35 y were studied at 36 +/- 1 wk gestation and 15 +/- 2 d postpartum. Total body water (TBW), total body potassium (TBK), body density, and bone mineral content were measured by deuterium dilution, whole-body potassium counting, hydrodensitometry, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (postpartum only), respectively. At 2 wk postpartum, hydration and density of fat-free mass (FFM) had not returned to nonpregnant values, and differed between lactating and nonlactating women (P < 0.05). Accordingly, standard TBW and body density estimates of fat mass differed from four-component estimates at both time points (P < 0.005). Moreover, our data indicate that even when pregnancy-specific values for hydration or density of FFM are used in TBW and body density models, individual fat mass estimates may differ by > 3 kg from the four-component value. Fat mass by TBK may differ by > 10 kg from fat mass by the four-component model during pregnancy, and by 6 kg postpartum. Use of standard two-compartment models to estimate fat mass results in significant error both during pregnancy and at 2 wk postpartum. Pregnancy-corrected two-compartment models produce reliable mean fat mass estimates during pregnancy, but individual fat mass estimates may vary widely from four-component values.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. C Papathakis, N. C Rollins, K. H Brown, M. L Bennish, and M. D Van Loan
Comparison of isotope dilution with bioimpedance spectroscopy and anthropometry for assessment of body composition in asymptomatic HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected breastfeeding mothers
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2005; 82(3): 538 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. E. Kopp-Hoolihan, M. D. van Loan, W. W. Wong, and J. C. King
Fat mass deposition during pregnancy using a four-component model
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1999; 87(1): 196 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. F Butte, J. M Hopkinson, N. Mehta, J. K Moon, and E O'B. Smith
Adjustments in energy expenditure and substrate utilization during late pregnancy and lactation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 1999; 69(2): 299 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Lewandowski, R. Horn, C. J. O’Callaghan, D. Dunlop, G. F. Medley, P. O’Hare, and G. Brabant
Free Leptin, Bound Leptin, and Soluble Leptin Receptor in Normal and Diabetic Pregnancies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1999; 84(1): 300 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. C. Kalhan, K. Q. Rossi, L. L. Gruca, D. M. Super, and S. M. Savin
Relation between transamination of branched-chain amino acids and urea synthesis: evidence from human pregnancy
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 1998; 275(3): E423 - E431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
R. AbuSabha and G. Greene
Body Weight, Body Composition, and Energy Intake Changes in Breastfeeding Mothers
J Hum Lact, June 1, 1998; 14(2): 119 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. F. Butte and J. M. Hopkinson
Body Composition Changes during Lactation Are Highly Variable among Women
J. Nutr., February 1, 1998; 128(2): 381 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition