|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 62, 471S-477S, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc
REVIEW ARTICLES |
MA Denke
Center for Human Nutrition, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235-9052, USA.
Individual variation in the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol response to a cholesterol-lowering diet has been well documented in inpatient and outpatient diet studies. This variation could be due to both clinical and biological factors. Clinical factors include adherence to dietary changes and changes in body weight. Biological factors include specific changes in dietary composition, initial serum cholesterol concentrations, presence of excess body weight, the fractional catabolic rate of LDL with a diet high in saturated fatty acid, the presence of specific isoforms of apoprotein E and apoprotein A-IV, changes in the gene encoding apoprotein B or the apoprotein A-I promoter region, and the ultracentrifugation pattern of LDL lipoproteins. Work exploring the metabolic basis for individual variation in responsiveness to a cholesterol-lowering diet is in its infancy. Careful studies controlling for the clinical influences of responsiveness are needed so that true biological determinants of response can be uncovered.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Lefevre, C. M Champagne, R. T Tulley, J. C Rood, and M. M Most Individual variability in cardiovascular disease risk factor responses to low-fat and low-saturated-fat diets in men: body mass index, adiposity, and insulin resistance predict changes in LDL cholesterol Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2005; 82(5): 957 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Hilpert, P. M. Kris-Etherton, and S. G. West Lipid Response to a Low-Fat Diet with or without Soy Is Modified by C-Reactive Protein Status in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic Adults J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1075 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Denke Reviewing your investment strategy: where does diet fit in your personal portfolio Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2005; 81(2): 339 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Li, J. D. Otvos, S. Lamon-Fava, W. V. Carrasco, A. H. Lichtenstein, J. R. McNamara, J. M. Ordovas, and E. J. Schaefer Men and Women Differ in Lipoprotein Response to Dietary Saturated Fat and Cholesterol Restriction J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3428 - 3433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Obarzanek, F. M Sacks, W. M Vollmer, G. A Bray, E. R Miller III, P.-H. Lin, N. M Karanja, M. M Most-Windhauser, T. J Moore, J. F Swain, et al. Effects on blood lipids of a blood pressure-lowering diet: the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2001; 74(1): 80 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Denke Revisiting the effectiveness of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I and Step II diets: cholesterol-lowering diets in a pharmaceutically driven world Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 1999; 69(4): 581 - 582. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jansen, J. Lopez-Miranda, J. Salas, P. Castro, J. A. Paniagua, F. Lopez-Segura, J. M. Ordovas, J. A. Jimenez-Pereperez, A. Blanco, and F. Perez-Jimenez Plasma Lipid Response to Hypolipidemic Diets in Young Healthy Non-Obese Men Varies with Body Mass Index J. Nutr., July 1, 1998; 128(7): 1144 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |