AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, M. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, M. B.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 62, 117-120, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Efficacy of weekly compared with daily iron supplementation

JD Cook and MB Reddy
Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City 66160-7402, USA.

A reduction in the frequency of iron supplement administration to once or twice weekly is being widely examined in developing countries on the assumption that the side effects of oral iron will decrease and that the reduction in administered iron will be offset by a lesser inhibition in absorption from iron taken on the previous day. We examined this premise by measuring iron absorption from 50 mg radiolabeled ferrous sulfate in 23 female volunteer subjects divided into two groups. In the first group, a labeled ferrous sulfate supplement was given with water, and in the second group it was given with a rice-based meal. In both groups, absorption was measured in a randomized fashion twice in each subject, once with daily and once with weekly supplementation. Those tested for daily supplementation were given an iron supplement daily for 6 d before testing whereas those tested for weekly supplementation were given no iron for 6 d before testing. When the labeled iron supplement was given with water only, absorption averaged 8.5% with daily and 9.8% with weekly administration compared with 2.3% and 2.6%, respectively, when given with food. The 13% lower absorption observed with daily administration in both groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.20). These results indicate that there is no significant absorptive advantage in giving iron less often than once daily.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Sungthong, L. Mo-suwan, V. Chongsuvivatwong, and A. F. Geater
Once-Weekly and 5-Days a Week Iron Supplementation Differentially Affect Cognitive Function but Not School Performance in Thai Children
J. Nutr., September 1, 2004; 134(9): 2349 - 2354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. R. Desai, R. Dhar, D. H. Rosen, S. K. Kariuki, Y. P. Shi, P. A. Kager, and F. O. ter Kuile
Daily Iron Supplementation Is More Efficacious than Twice Weekly Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Childhood Anemia in Western Kenya
J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1167 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E.-C. Ekstrom, S. Z. Hyder, A M. R Chowdhury, S. A Chowdhury, B. Lonnerdal, J.-P. Habicht, and L. A. Persson
Efficacy and trial effectiveness of weekly and daily iron supplementation among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh: disentangling the issues
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1392 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. K. Shah and P. Gupta
Weekly vs Daily Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation in Adolescent Nepalese Girls
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2002; 156(2): 131 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Z. K Roughead and J. R Hunt
Adaptation in iron absorption: iron supplementation reduces nonheme-iron but not heme-iron absorption from food
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2000; 72(4): 982 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. Rush
Nutrition and maternal mortality in the developing world
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 212S - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. H Bothwell
Iron requirements in pregnancy and strategies to meet them
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 257S - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. L Beard
Effectiveness and strategies of iron supplementation during pregnancy
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2000; 71(5): 1288S - 1294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. Zavaleta, G. Respicio, and T. Garcia
Efficacy and Acceptability of Two Iron Supplementation Schedules in Adolescent School Girls in Lima, Peru
J. Nutr., February 1, 2000; 130(2): 462 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
W. Schultink, R. Gross, and L. Hallberg
Use of daily compared with weekly iron supplementation: apples and pears
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 1999; 69(4): 739 - 742.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Nutrition