AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garn, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawthorne, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garn, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawthorne, V. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Garn, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawthorne, V. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 50, 740-745, Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Educational level, fatness, and fatness differences between husbands and wives

SM Garn, TV Sullivan and VM Hawthorne
Center for Human Growth and Development, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0406.

In 1017 husband-wife pairs aged 20-49 y, both fatness and weight of the wives is inversely and linearly related to educational level whereas the husbands' summed skinfold measurements bear a curvilinear, parabolic relationship to years of schooling. Overall, fatness differences between husbands and wives diminish with increased education, and beyond 13 y of education husbands often exceed the subcutaneous fat thickness of their wives. When the education of one spouse is held constant at 9-12 y, women who marry up to men of greater education are systematically leaner and women who mary down are both fatter and heavier. These findings in spouse pairs sharing a common family income suggest that assortative mating with respect to educational level accounts for much of the socioeconomic effect in fatness including the fatness differences between women who marry down and those who marry up. These data also demonstrate that women are not fatter than men at all socioeconomic levels.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
L. McLaren
Socioeconomic Status and Obesity
Epidemiol. Rev., May 2, 2007; (2007) mxm001v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J Wardle and J Griffith
Socioeconomic status and weight control practices in British adults
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2001; 55(3): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
J. SOBAL, B. S. RAUSCHENBACH, and E. A. FRONGILLO Jr.
Obesity and Marital Quality: Analysis of Weight, Marital Unhappiness, and Marital Problems in a U.S. National Sample
Journal of Family Issues, November 1, 1995; 16(6): 746 - 764.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Nutrition