AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaton, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Steele, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beaton, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Steele, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beaton, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Steele, C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 50, 575-588, Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Nutrition

Conceptual and methodological issues regarding the epidemiology of iron deficiency and their implications for studies of the functional consequences of iron deficiency

George H Beaton 1, Paul N Corey 1, and Cathy Steele 1

1 From the Departments of Nutritional Sciences and Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto

This paper reviews the measures of iron status (hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, mean cell volume, free erythrocyte protoporphyrin, serum iron, transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin) that are potentially available for inclusion in field studies of the relationship between iron and mental performance. The characteristics of these measures (sensitivity to iron status, specificity to iron, and diurnal and day-to-day variability) are reviewed and the implications of choice of variable for the design, analysis, and interpretation of studies are discussed. Brief consideration is given to the question of confounding variables and to sources of both false-positive and false-negative conclusions. The explicit message of the paper is that there is no perfect choice of measure of iron status but, given explicit definition of the research question, there are preferred choices that can most effectively combine the choice of variable and the design of the study.

Key Words: Iron • iron status • cognition • psychology • epidemiology




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. G. Traxler and J. T. Benjamin
The Incidence, Treatment, and Follow-up of Iron Deficiency in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Clinic
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 44(4): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Nutrition