AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riumallo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Uauy, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riumallo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Uauy, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Riumallo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Uauy, R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 49, 239-246, Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Energy expenditure in underweight free-living adults: impact of energy supplementation as determined by doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry

JA Riumallo, D Schoeller, G Barrera, V Gattas and R Uauy
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago.

The effect of energy supplementation was evaluated in six underweight adults under free-living conditions. Customary energy intake (EI) over 4 wk and estimated body composition were defined. Then for 12 wk subjects were fed their customary EI under controlled conditions to assure stable energy reserve. Finally, intake was increased by a mean of 720 kcal/d for 8 wk adjusted to increase body fat from 9 to 18%. Body weight (means +/- SD) increased from 55.2 +/- 3.4 to 57.0 +/- 4.2 kg. Body fat gain was highly variable ranging from 0.6 to 3.8 kg. Energy expenditure (EE) by the factorial and doubly labeled water methods did not change. Fat storage accounted for 66% of the supplemental energy; 237 kcal/d remained unaccounted for. EE by the factorial method, which uses indirect calorimetry or isotopic measurements, were highly correlated (r = 0.8; p less than 0.01). Under the conditions of this study EI does not affect EE. The labeled water method permits the evaluation of energy expenditure in free-living conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. de Jonge, J. P DeLany, T. Nguyen, J. Howard, E. C Hadley, L. M Redman, and E. Ravussin
Validation study of energy expenditure and intake during calorie restriction using doubly labeled water and changes in body composition
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
V. Van Wymelbeke, L. Brondel, J. Marcel Brun, and D. Rigaud
Factors associated with the increase in resting energy expenditure during refeeding in malnourished anorexia nervosa patients
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1469 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. A Schoeller
The importance of clinical research: the role of thermogenesis in human obesity
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2001; 73(3): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. Kinney
Indirect Calorimetry: The Search for Clinical Relevance
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 1992; 7(5): 203 - 206.
[PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Nutrition