AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Quinney, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Quinney, H. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Quinney, H. A.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 48, 1362-1366, Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Body fat assessed from body density and estimated from skinfold thickness in normal children and children with cystic fibrosis

JL Johnston, MS Leong, EG Checkland, PC Zuberbuhler, PR Conger and HA Quinney
Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Body density and skinfold thickness at four sites were measured in 140 normal boys, 168 normal girls, and 6 boys and 7 girls with cystic fibrosis, all aged 8-14 y. Prediction equations for the normal boys and girls for the estimation of body-fat content from skinfold measurements were derived from linear regression of body density vs the log of the sum of the skinfold thickness. The relationship between body density and the log of the sum of the skinfold measurements differed from normal for the boys and girls with cystic fibrosis because of their high body density even though their large residual volume was corrected for. However the sum of skinfold measurements in the children with cystic fibrosis did not differ from normal. Thus body fat percent of these children with cystic fibrosis was underestimated when calculated from body density and invalid when calculated from skinfold thickness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J C K Wells and M S Fewtrell
Measuring body composition
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 612 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. R. Schmelzle and C. Fusch
Body fat in neonates and young infants: validation of skinfold thickness versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2002; 76(5): 1096 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. R Boye, T. Dimitriou, F. Manz, E. Schoenau, C. Neu, S. Wudy, and T. Remer
Anthropometric assessment of muscularity during growth: estimating fat-free mass with 2 skinfold-thickness measurements is superior to measuring midupper arm muscle area in healthy prepubertal children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2002; 76(3): 628 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Stettler, D. A Kawchak, L. L Boyle, K. J Propert, T. F Scanlin, V. A Stallings, and B. S Zemel
Prospective evaluation of growth, nutritional status, and body composition in children with cystic fibrosis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2000; 72(2): 407 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. C. Wells, N. J Fuller, O. Dewit, M. S Fewtrell, M. Elia, and T. J Cole
Four-component model of body composition in children: density and hydration of fat-free mass and comparison with simpler models
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 1999; 69(5): 904 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Nutrition