AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rocchini, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rocchini, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Katch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rocchini, A.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 48, 565-569, Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Basal metabolism of obese adolescents: inconsistent diet and exercise effects

V Katch, MD Becque, C Marks, C Moorehead and A Rocchini
Department of Kinesiology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Effects of 20 wk of diet-plus-behavior (DB) therapy or exercise-plus- diet-plus-behavior (EDB) therapy on changes in basal energy expenditure (BEE) were studied in 36 obese male and female adolescents. BEE was assessed by open-circuit spirometry and body composition by hydrostatic weighing. Dietary restriction was based on the dietary-exchange program. Behavioral treatment included record-keeping, stimulus- control, and reinforcement techniques. EDB therapy included 50 min/d, 3 d/wk of aerobics. A time-by-group (2 X 3) repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze pre-to-postintervention differences between groups (DB, EDB, and control). Results revealed small but statistically significant (p less than 0.05) differences in body composition between the two experimental groups and control subjects. There were no differences in body composition between the DB and EDB groups, although all control subjects gained body mass (p less than 0.05). There was no group-by- time interaction for BEE. Moderate correlations of r = less than or equal to 0.61 were obtained between change in BEE and change in body composition for the subjects in the experimental groups.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Nutrition