AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordeuk, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opplt, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordeuk, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opplt, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gordeuk, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opplt, J. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 46, 1029-1034, Copyright © 1987 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

High-dose carbonyl iron for iron deficiency anemia: a randomized double- blind trial

VR Gordeuk, GM Brittenham, M Hughes, LJ Keating and JJ Opplt
Department of Medicine, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, OH 44109.

To determine if high doses of oral iron could shorten the duration of therapy necessary to treat Fe deficiency anemia, high-dose Fe 600 mg three times per day (given as nontoxic carbonyl Fe) was compared with standard ferrous sulfate 60 mg Fe++ three times per day in a randomized, double-blind, 3-wk trial involving 36 female blood donors with mild Fe deficiency anemia. In animal studies, both forms of Fe have similar bioavailability when administered in equal amounts. High- dose carbonyl Fe was well tolerated with gastrointestinal side effects similar those observed with standard FeSO4 therapy. The 10-fold larger amount of Fe resulted in a mean 1.5-fold increase in estimated Fe absorption. Both regimens corrected anemia but neither replenished storage Fe. These results suggest that the principal advantage to the use of carbonyl Fe would derive from its safety rather than from the large doses that can be given.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. H. Swain, L. K. Johnson, and J. R. Hunt
Electrolytic Iron or Ferrous Sulfate Increase Body Iron in Women with Moderate to Low Iron Stores
J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 620 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
G. M. Brittenham, H. G. Klein, J. P. Kushner, and R. S. Ajioka
Preserving the National Blood Supply
Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 422 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by The American Society for Nutrition