AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloane, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sloane, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sloane, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 42, 235-241, Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Evaluation of zinc and copper nutritional status and effects upon growth of southern adolescent females

BA Sloane, CC Gibbons and M Hegsted

A biracial sample of twenty-nine 14-yr old and thirty 16-yr old females was evaluated for zinc and copper nutritional status. Socioeconomic, demographic, anthropometric and 24-h dietary recall data were collected and plasma zinc and copper and erythrocyte zinc levels determined. Mean plasma zinc was 83 +/- 15 micrograms/dl; racial differences were significant (p less than 0.05) with plasma zinc levels at 87 +/- 3 micrograms/dl for whites and 79 +/- 3 micrograms/dl for blacks. Mean plasma copper was 119 +/- 24 micrograms/dl and was slightly higher for blacks than for whites. Mean erythrocyte zinc was 8.3 +/- 2.7 micrograms/g and represented 10 times the level of zinc in plasma. Plasma copper levels were positively (p less than 0.05) related to body size. Plasma copper was negatively (p less than 0.05) related to dietary fiber. Other dietary and economic factors did not affect mineral status.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Nutrition