AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odland, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexeff, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odland, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexeff, A. I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Odland, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexeff, A. I.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 25, 908-911, Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Bone density and dietary findings of 409 Tennessee subjects. II. Dietary considerations

Lura M. Odland B.S., M.S., Ph.D., D.Sc.1, Rossie L. Mason B.S., M.S.1, and Anne I. Alexeff B.S.1

1 From the Department of Nutrition, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37916 and the Tennessee State Experiment Station Division, United States Department of Agriculture

Dietary findings are discussed from the standpoint of the NAS—NRC Recommended Dietary Allowances. Protein, thiamin, riboflavin, and niacin intakes were generally good. Males had more adequate calcium, vitamin A, and iron intakes than did females, whereas the latter received more adequate amounts of calories than did males.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Nutrition