AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paul, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Paul, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, L. C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 25, 763-765, Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Effect of oral lactobacillus feedings on fecal lacto bacillus counts

Dharam Paul M.D.1 and Lansing C. Hoskins M.D.1

1 From the Gastroenterology Unit, Veterans Administration Hospital and the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Reports suggesting that oral feedings of L. acidophilus with lactose benefited patients with hepatic encephalopathy prompted us to determine if oral feedings of these lactobacilli altered the fecal aerobic (microaerophilic) lactobacillus count. The fecal aerobic lactobacillus counts per gram wet weight of stool were determined in multiple stool specimens from 10 subjects before, during, and following oral administration of a commercial preparation of lyophilized lactobacilli, predominantly L. acidophilus. Prior to administration of oral lactobacilli, the mean FALC differed by as much as a millionfold among the subjects, but the FALC from day to day for each subject showed smaller variations that were one hundredfold or less in nine subjects. During administration of 108 to 109 viable lactobacilli per day, the FALC increased initially in five subjects but returned to pretreatment levels within 10 days despite continued administration of the organisms and in five subjects the FALC did not change. One subject showed an increase in FALC during treatment that persisted at high levels for 3 weeks after lactobacillus feedings were stopped before returning to pretreatment levels. No increase in FALC occurred when this subject was given a second course of oral lactobacilli. In all others, the posttreatment counts were similar to their pretreatment counts. We conclude that oral lactobacillus feedings have no appreciable or sustained effect on the size of the colonic aerobic lactobacillus population as measured by fecal counts.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Nutrition