AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahaffy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Will, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahaffy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Will, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mahaffy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Will, G.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 25, 703-708, Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

A double-tracer test of the oral absorption of 57Co- and 58Co-vitamin B12 using a whole-body monitor: clinical experience and technical factors

Maureen E. Mahaffy B.Sc., Keith Boddy B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D., F.Inst.P.1, and George Will B.Sc., M.B., Ch.B., F.R.C.P.G., M.R.C.P.E.2

1 Senior Lecturer (Health Physics and Nuclear Medicine), Scottish (Universities) Research Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow, Scotland
2 Consultant Physician, Gateside Hospital, Greenock, Scotland

Clinical experience with a double-tracer test of the oral absorption of 58Co-vitamin B12 (free vitamin B12) and of 57Co-vitamin B12 with intrinsic factor (bound vitamin B12) is reported. Absorption of the free and bound vitamin was measured simultaneously using a whole-body monitor. Control subjects absorbed 19.6 to 84.9% of free vitamin B12 and the absorption ratio of bound/free in any subject did not exceed 2. In patients with pernicious anemia, the absorption of free vitamin B12 ranged from 0.3 to 16.2% and the absorption ratio in all patients was greater than 2. Technical sources of error are considered and examined; the errors are shown to be acceptable and the advantages of the test are outlined.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Nutrition