AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fubara, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Freter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fubara, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Freter, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fubara, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Freter, R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 25, 1357-1363, Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Source and protective function of coproantibodies in intestinal disease

E. S. Fubara Ph.D.1 and R. Freter Ph.D.1

1 From the Department of Microbiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

This paper describes studies of the mechanisms by which intestinal antibody may be delivered to the lumen of the intestine. The results indicate that in all animals studied (conventional mice, conventionalized mice, and germfree mice), antibody may appear in the intestine as a result of local synthesis or may be derived from serum antibody. Serum antibody was degraded in the intestine of all types of mice studied, but degradation in germfree mice was so rapid that no serum antibody was detectable in the intestine. The presence, and probably the quality, of intestinal flora was therefore shown to affect the host by a new mechanism: the sparing of intestinal antibody. High antibody titers in the intestine of orally vaccinated germfree mice were due to secretory IgA antibodies that appeared to be more resistant to intestinal degradation than the IgG and IgM fractions derived from the serum.

Purified intestinal IgA antibody was shown to protect in vivo isolated intestinal loops of mice against experimental cholera. The implications of these findings for the problems of prophylactic immunity to bacterial enteric pathogens and of immunological control of normal enteric bacterial flora were disscussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
H. Marcotte and M. C. Lavoie
Oral Microbial Ecology and the Role of Salivary Immunoglobulin A
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 1998; 62(1): 71 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Nutrition